Hi all,
> Am 02.08.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Mark Tinka <[email protected]>: > On 2/Aug/17 11:58, Gert Doering wrote: >> This is what we currently do for "BGP edge", and I totally love the >> box. Even though software updates are as annoying, mostly because the >> flash disk is so sloooowwwww so the fairly complex processes take ages, >> and then a bit. >> > > Indeed. > > I also find the ASR9001 a lot slower than the ASR1000 (RP2). But it's not as > bad as the PPC-based MX's. My preferred supplier just called in telling me that ASR 9001 are way more expensive currently than, say, ASR 1002 with RP2. I'll get a quote later today. ASR 9006 OTOH are rather cheap for their capabilities he claims - but definitely too big for the current project. Possibly for the new data centre ... So, any remarks about the 1002? Thanks, Patrick
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
