On 02/08/17 13:10, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > > >> Am 02.08.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Mark Tinka <[email protected]>: >> On 2/Aug/17 11:58, Gert Doering wrote: >>> This is what we currently do for "BGP edge", and I totally love the >>> box. Even though software updates are as annoying, mostly because the >>> flash disk is so sloooowwwww so the fairly complex processes take ages, >>> and then a bit. >>> >> >> Indeed. >> >> I also find the ASR9001 a lot slower than the ASR1000 (RP2). But it's not as >> bad as the PPC-based MX's. > > My preferred supplier just called in telling me that ASR 9001 are way more > expensive > currently than, say, ASR 1002 with RP2. I'll get a quote later today. > > ASR 9006 OTOH are rather cheap for their capabilities he claims - but > definitely > too big for the current project. Possibly for the new data centre ...
There also newer ones Cisco 9901 its fixed 2U chassis with 16X1G, 24X1G/10G, 2X100G which is intel based and support 64bit IOS-XR, but I'm not sure when they plan to release them, maybe Q1 2018. Licensing wise its - PAYG model 120G,240G,360G,456G _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
