> On Aug 2, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Patrick M. Hausen <hau...@punkt.de> wrote: > My preferred supplier just called in telling me that ASR 9001 are way more > expensive > currently than, say, ASR 1002 with RP2. I'll get a quote later today. > ASR 9006 OTOH are rather cheap for their capabilities he claims - but > definitely > too big for the current project. Possibly for the new data centre ... > So, any remarks about the 1002?
PCH has a lot of ASR9001s and ASR9006s in production. A few ASR1001X. We’re
just doing the lab-work now to figure out whether the NCS5501 can replace the
ASR9006 in some situations.
The 9001 is a real workhorse, and we continue to buy them. The ASR1001X is
just a little too small to work for our medium-sized sites, and too expensive
for our small sites.
The NCS5501 looks like it’ll be great for medium-to-high throughput but
low-complexity sites, particularly when paired with a Nexus 92300YC or
93180YC-EX switch. If the memory limitations don’t prove to be too
constraining.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
