>> On 3 Aug 2017, at 09:10, Patrick M. Hausen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The use case is simply "full tables BGP" with currently 4x 1GB/s >> uplinks and possibly 6 in the near future. Upgrade to something >> 10G-ish not planned at the moment. 300-400 Mbit/s aggregate >> traffic across all uplinks currently.
What about an ISR4451? Rock-solid, have 10x the throughput you need, they just
don’t do 10G interfaces. And way cheaper than any of the other options you’ve
discussed. It seems like it might be “good enough for long enough” and then
you could recycle it in some other use when it comes time for an upgrade (and
when there’s something palatable to upgrade to, like perhaps the ASR9901 that
was mentioned yesterday).
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
