Or the way nexus does it - E for everything, best of all. From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Gehring Kai Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 6:41 AM To: Tom Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10/25 interface behavior
This message originates from outside of your organisation. At least on the Catalyst 9000 series it looks like they switched to always using the highest bandwidth that would potentially be available on that interface... just checked on a 9200L and a 9500-16X: The interface name is always TenGigabitEthernet, even if you use 1Gbit SFPs in them. Much better imho, different interface names with different transceivers is just such a pain.. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/kLbeCk5EVuQw9SQlMwE?domain=puck.nether.net> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/<https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/uLn-ClOGVfZMxcqvKQV?domain=puck.nether.net> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
