Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Codec assignment (Scott Voll)
2. Re: Codec assignment (Chris Ward (chrward))
3. Re: Codec assignment (Jason Aarons (AM))
4. Re: Codec assignment (Scott Voll)
5. difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation vs
VMWare vSphere (Lelio Fulgenzi)
6. Re: difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation vs
VMWare vSphere (Matthew Loraditch)
7. Re: difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation vs
VMWare vSphere (Lelio Fulgenzi)
8. UCCX Issues (Sarjo Touray)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:42 -0700
From: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Message-ID:
<CAHgd+3_p89OUA=hfD0NFfe+Y0fDTX2=mbwskvdfhhpjr-ki...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Where beside the Region / DP can you set the codec for a phone / ExtMob
user?
I have the region / DP setup for G711 but the user is suing G729.
CM 7.1.5
TIa
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/16abad53/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:36:51 +0000
From: "Chris Ward (chrward)" <[email protected]>
To: Scott Voll <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CIPC can force G729 at the device level. Also, if a transcoder or MTP is being
invoked, it's region relationship to the 2 devices also comes into play.
Regions really only set the max allowed bandwidth per call rather than the
codec itself. The 8.X and later interfaces do a little better job at explaining
this.
+Chris
Unity Connection TME
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Where beside the Region / DP can you set the codec for a phone / ExtMob user?
I have the region / DP setup for G711 but the user is suing G729.
CM 7.1.5
TIa
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/a76a6d39/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:43:11 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" <[email protected]>, Scott Voll
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d2a046...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
In CIPC it's the checkmark under Audio > Optimize for Low Bandwidth (it really
means use G.729)
Since G729 is less than 80k in regions it can be used. Also check any dial
peers.
Is this phone-to-phone or phone-to-gateway, etc?
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Ward (chrward)
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:37 PM
To: Scott Voll; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
CIPC can force G729 at the device level. Also, if a transcoder or MTP is being
invoked, it's region relationship to the 2 devices also comes into play.
Regions really only set the max allowed bandwidth per call rather than the
codec itself. The 8.X and later interfaces do a little better job at explaining
this.
+Chris
Unity Connection TME
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Where beside the Region / DP can you set the codec for a phone / ExtMob user?
I have the region / DP setup for G711 but the user is suing G729.
CM 7.1.5
TIa
Scott
itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/14adc877/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:58:08 -0700
From: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment
Message-ID:
<cahgd+39yket8waxp5jvoooxxxbaavgomushc639ljkk7rxd...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
That was it (IPC).... Thanks Jason!
Scott
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> In CIPC it?s the checkmark under Audio > Optimize for Low Bandwidth (it
> really means use G.729)****
>
> ** **
>
> Since G729 is less than 80k in regions it can be used. Also check any
> dial peers.****
>
> ** **
>
> Is this phone-to-phone or phone-to-gateway, etc?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Ward (chrward)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:37 PM
> *To:* Scott Voll; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Codec assignment****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> CIPC can force G729 at the device level. Also, if a transcoder or MTP is
> being invoked, it?s region relationship to the 2 devices also comes into
> play. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regions really only set the max allowed bandwidth per call rather than the
> codec itself. The 8.X and later interfaces do a little better job at
> explaining this.****
>
> ** **
>
> +Chris****
>
> Unity Connection TME****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:32 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Codec assignment****
>
> ** **
>
> Where beside the Region / DP can you set the codec for a phone / ExtMob
> user?****
>
> ** **
>
> I have the region / DP setup for G711 but the user is suing G729.****
>
> ** **
>
> CM 7.1.5****
>
> ** **
>
> TIa****
>
> ** **
>
> Scott****
>
>
>
> itevomcid ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/d9c32b85/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:58:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: Cisco VoIPoE List <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization
Foundation vs VMWare vSphere
Message-ID:
<320026251.1285262.1348696726183.javamail.r...@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
just wondering if anyone has any comments on the difference between Cisco UC
Virtualization Foundation vs VMWare vSphere ? it says that one of these is
required. i'm looking at a couple of C series installations.
Is Foundations "free"? Will it give me everything I need to manage these VMs?
Thoughts?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/9e9bdfa4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:10:34 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>, Cisco VoIPoE List
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization
Foundation vs VMWare vSphere
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Foundation is not free but is cheaper than standard
Details here (scroll down just a wee bit):
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Supported_Editions_and_Features_of_VMware_vSphere_ESXi.2C_VMware_vCenter_and_VMware_vSphere_Client
I use it on my installs but it does have RAM limitations, even though VMWare
has dumped those, this is a Cisco OEM Version and the RAM limit still exists as
of now.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:59 PM
To: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation vs
VMWare vSphere
just wondering if anyone has any comments on the difference between Cisco UC
Virtualization Foundation vs VMWare vSphere ? it says that one of these is
required. i'm looking at a couple of C series installations.
Is Foundations "free"? Will it give me everything I need to manage these VMs?
Thoughts?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/097d715b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:14:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization
Foundation vs VMWare vSphere
Message-ID:
<229534994.1285879.1348697690574.javamail.r...@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks Matthew. I just found the article after I hit send. I noticed the memory
limitations.
Apparently VMware was getting a few complaints from their customers so as of
vSphere 5.1 there are no longer any memory limitations. The docwiki shows
support for up to 5.0 (and 5.0 updates) only so it will be interesting to see
how this will affect the supported apps.
I'll probably go with a full VMware license for now and if we can save money
later, great.
Now to see which version of VMware to pick.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Loraditch" <[email protected]>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]>, "Cisco VoIPoE List"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:10:34 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation
vs VMWare vSphere
Foundation is not free but is cheaper than standard
Details here (scroll down just a wee bit):
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Supported_Editions_and_Features_of_VMware_vSphere_ESXi.2C_VMware_vCenter_and_VMware_vSphere_Client
I use it on my installs but it does have RAM limitations, even though VMWare
has dumped those, this is a Cisco OEM Version and the RAM limit still exists as
of now.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:59 PM
To: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] difference between Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation vs
VMWare vSphere
just wondering if anyone has any comments on the difference between Cisco UC
Virtualization Foundation vs VMWare vSphere ? it says that one of these is
required. i'm looking at a couple of C series installations.
Is Foundations "free"? Will it give me everything I need to manage these VMs?
Thoughts?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120926/1b6f93a5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:59:09 +0100
From: Sarjo Touray <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX Issues
Message-ID:
<CAL33s_W9=jyj-h4axup1z1vvhhb4uubbdr12zqnou+trif9...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
Yesterday at about 15:15pm 26/09/2011 all the agents on our contact center
where logged out of the system and the they did not failover to our
secondary UCCX Server. After rebooting the servers thay all came back
online. We just want to know what happen prior to that time the agents
being logout.
Attached is the MIVR Logs for both servers covering around the time 15:15pm
the incident happen. Any help in breifly reviewing the logs and advise
would be greately aprreciated.
Regards
Sarj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120927/054adeb7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mirv log on Cisco Media Convergence Server (10.65.0.11).zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 1345559 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120927/054adeb7/attachment.zip>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MIVR Logs on Cisco Media Convergence Server (10.65.0.12).zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 1655056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20120927/054adeb7/attachment-0001.zip>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 107, Issue 23
*******************************************
