Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. SPA500 CUCM (Leslie Meade)
2. 6961 Manage button associations? (Jason Aarons (AM))
3. Re: 6961 Manage button associations? (Jason Aarons (AM))
4. Re: SPA500 CUCM (Jason Faraone)
5. R: Telco SIP trunk with Cisco Voice Gateway and CUCM 9.1
(Alessandro Bertacco)
6. Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Jason Aarons (AM))
7. Re: Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Norton, Mike)
8. Re: Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Wes Sisk)
9. Re: Extension Mobility Issue (Ryan Ratliff)
10. Re: Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Robert Kulagowski)
11. Re: Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Nate VanMaren)
12. CUCM 8.5 DLU's (abbas Wali)
13. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (Lelio Fulgenzi)
14. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (Ted Nugent)
15. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (Lelio Fulgenzi)
16. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (abbas Wali)
17. increase volume inbound on MGCP VGW (Scott Voll)
18. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (abbas Wali)
19. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (Lelio Fulgenzi)
20. Re: Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
21. Re: CUCM 8.5 DLU's (Ted Nugent)
22. CDR references (Haas, Neal)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:34:52 +0000
From: Leslie Meade <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SPA500 CUCM
Message-ID:
<f64719604b4e6f41bdbb2af38e7609f44c129...@lvscgyex03.longviewsystems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I know that it is not supported but has anyone managed to get a phone into
callmanager 8.X ?
I have tried 3rd party SIP basic and advanced and it does not work.
Leslie Meade
[Description: Description: Long View Systems]
Bach Information Technology
CCNA CCVP CCIE Voice 38727
Network Consultant
..................................................................
Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[Description: Linkedin]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/17908> [Description:
Twitter] <http://twitter.com/LongViewSystems> [Description: Facebook]
<http://www.facebook.com/longviewsystems> [Description: Google+]
<http://gplus.to/longviewsystems> [Description: Facebook]
<http://www.youtube.com/longviewsystems> [Description: 50 Best Managed Company]
www.longviewsystems.com<http://www.longviewsystems.com/>
This message and any attached documents are only for the use of
the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other
disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, notify the sender immediately, and delete the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1912 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 475 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 470 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1320 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0010.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: image006.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0011.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3419 bytes
Desc: image007.gif
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b5b4575a/attachment-0001.gif>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:54:38 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 6961 Manage button associations?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d332a0...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
How do I put 12 lines on a 6961? I'm not clear what this error means?
I'm in the Bulk Admin > Phone Templates > SIP 6961 and trying to make a 12 line
phone.
"Fixed feature button(s) 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 5 cannot be changed. Please make sure
the button number matches the relative positions in the button list."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/5fc06f8c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:59:00 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 6961 Manage button associations?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d332a0...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Nevermind. I was looking at a 6945 not a 6961.
From: Jason Aarons (AM)
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:55 AM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: 6961 Manage button associations?
How do I put 12 lines on a 6961? I'm not clear what this error means?
I'm in the Bulk Admin > Phone Templates > SIP 6961 and trying to make a 12 line
phone.
"Fixed feature button(s) 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 5 cannot be changed. Please make sure
the button number matches the relative positions in the button list."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/49ff0377/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:54:24 +0000
From: Jason Faraone <[email protected]>
To: "'Leslie Meade'" <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SPA500 CUCM
Message-ID:
<fb0beb07ca11e54a83b331ad1c263ed665bc7...@chq-mdf-mbx-01.paulo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This may be relevant:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2051976
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Leslie Meade
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:35 PM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: [cisco-voip] SPA500 CUCM
I know that it is not supported but has anyone managed to get a phone into
callmanager 8.X ?
I have tried 3rd party SIP basic and advanced and it does not work.
Leslie Meade
[Description: Description: Long View Systems]
Bach Information Technology
CCNA CCVP CCIE Voice 38727
Network Consultant
..................................................................
Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[Description: Linkedin]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/17908> [Description:
Twitter] <http://twitter.com/LongViewSystems> [Description: Facebook]
<http://www.facebook.com/longviewsystems> [Description: Google+]
<http://gplus.to/longviewsystems> [Description: Facebook]
<http://www.youtube.com/longviewsystems> [Description: 50 Best Managed Company]
www.longviewsystems.com<http://www.longviewsystems.com/>
This message and any attached documents are only for the use of
the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other
disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, notify the sender immediately, and delete the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1912 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0007.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 475 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 470 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1320 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0010.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: image006.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0011.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3419 bytes
Desc: image007.gif
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/c2f1724b/attachment-0001.gif>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 21:00:31 +0200
From: Alessandro Bertacco <[email protected]>
To: Ted Nugent <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] R: Telco SIP trunk with Cisco Voice Gateway and
CUCM 9.1
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (added by
[email protected])
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you Ted.
Alessandro
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Ted Nugent
Inviato: 16/05/2013 16:27
A: [email protected]
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] Telco SIP trunk with Cisco Voice Gateway and CUCM 9.1
Yes, you'll need a CUBE license, see link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/gatecont/ps5640/order_guide_c07_462222.html
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:06 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys I'll need to use a voice gateway Cisco to connect to SIP trunk on
> telco provider.
>
> The topology will be this one:
>
> Telco -----SIP Trunk----> Cisco 2901 SRST -----> H.323 -------> CUCM 9.1
>
> The question is, I'll need to purchase the SBC license? Or other license
> features?
> Thank you all.
>
> Regards
>
> Alessandro Bertacco
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/1b5d434b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:49:59 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII
values in 2013?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d332a1...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I don't see a reason to populate ASCII XXXXXX in a new CallManager 9.x
(3905,89xx, 69xx, 7945/65 and newer)
Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don't support
Internationalization (sp?).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_1_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_C3E0EFA0_00_cucm-features-services-guide-91_chapter_0110.html
Display - This field supports internationalization. If your phone does not
support internationalization, the system uses the text that displays in the
Label ASCII field.
ASCII Display -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/b471a71d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 21:12:54 +0000
From: "Norton, Mike" <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any
ASCII values in 2013?
Message-ID:
<2c4107b204f8e74eb0a63ef59b0f970212bb7...@pwsdexchange06.pwsb33.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In the case of the Call Display values, the ASCII one is what will get sent out
your ISDN gateways. ISDN does not support internationalized caller names, I
assume. (Despite the web UI's claim, in 8.6 at least, that these fields are for
"Internal Caller ID" that is actually a total lie, there is nothing internal
about it.) Putting different text for the non-ASCII and the ASCII makes for a
handy way to have specific names displayed to internal callees, and generic
business name displayed to external callees. Of course, if you live in a
country where the PSTN ignores the name you send out your ISDN trunk, such as
the U.S., then it doesn't matter.
For the line text label, it does seem completely useless to have the option of
an ASCII value since it's not as if the model of phone will dynamically change
to a model that only supports ASCII.
-mn
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: May-16-13 2:50 PM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013?
I don't see a reason to populate ASCII XXXXXX in a new CallManager 9.x
(3905,89xx, 69xx, 7945/65 and newer)
Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don't support
Internationalization (sp?).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_1_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_C3E0EFA0_00_cucm-features-services-guide-91_chapter_0110.html
Display - This field supports internationalization. If your phone does not
support internationalization, the system uses the text that displays in the
Label ASCII field.
ASCII Display -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/ebdb8fa4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:16:17 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>
To: Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any
ASCII values in 2013?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
[showing my age]
Analog phones come to mind?
On May 16, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
wrote:
I don?t see a reason to populate ASCII XXXXXX in a new CallManager 9.x
(3905,89xx, 69xx, 7945/65 and newer)
Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don?t support
Internationalization (sp?).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_1_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_C3E0EFA0_00_cucm-features-services-guide-91_chapter_0110.html
Display - This field supports internationalization. If your phone does not
support internationalization, the system uses the text that displays in the
Label ASCII field.
ASCII Display ?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/d72d4af5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:43 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Nick <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility Issue
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Nick,
Can you check the output of 'show tech notify" on that sub and see if "ccmdb"
was in the list?
Keep an eye on it and if you see it missing open a TAC SR and email me the
number ASAP.
Thanks,
-Ryan
On May 15, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Nick <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All
dbreplication was being reported as good (all 2's) via RTMT and the Unfied CM
Database Status report was shoing as no errors and all fine. In the end I did a
utils dbreplication reset for the affected subscriber and eventually it came
back and was working fine. Its not good that the replication was reporting as
fine when there clearly was an issue with it though, this is 9.1.1a
Cheers
Nick
On 15 May 2013 13:13, Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
How is the replication on the cluster?
Regards
Andy
On 15/05/2013 11:18, Nick wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have an issue with only one subscriber, which when phones are registered to
> it and you log in with extension mobility it does not display the device
> profile info, the phone in CUCM admin shows the UDP as logged in and when you
> go to extension mobility service, it shows the user as logged in. I have
> tried reregistering the phone to the other 3 subscribers and the phone
> registers fine and displays the profile. I have rebooted the affected
> subscriber and during the reboot the phone registers with the backup
> subscriber and display UDP fine, but when the phone registers with its
> primary sub it the UDP will not display.
>
> Anyone come across this before?
>
> Nick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/40beb096/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:55:53 -0500
From: Robert Kulagowski <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any
ASCII values in 2013?
Message-ID:
<CAGe0w3SmgRFTmzM-87vq5EnnSZUb020nG6Y=i0-w5NM=abq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don?t
> support Internationalization (sp?).
aka, "i18n"
and then there's
"l10n" - localization
H.T.H.!
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:11:19 +0000
From: Nate VanMaren <[email protected]>
To: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>, Jason Aarons
<[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any
ASCII values in 2013?
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You need them.
Things like call pickup notification use the ASCII alertingname.
Also a neat feature is when the locales are different then it automatically
shows the ASCII to the other phone.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wes
Sisk
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Jason Aarons
Cc: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values
in 2013?
[showing my age]
Analog phones come to mind...
On May 16, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Jason Aarons (AM)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't see a reason to populate ASCII XXXXXX in a new CallManager 9.x
(3905,89xx, 69xx, 7945/65 and newer)
Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don't support
Internationalization (sp?).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_1_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_C3E0EFA0_00_cucm-features-services-guide-91_chapter_0110.html
Display - This field supports internationalization. If your phone does not
support internationalization, the system uses the text that displays in the
Label ASCII field.
ASCII Display -
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130516/1185ed2b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:14:46 +0100
From: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<cafdhcp5fe1bhd--96dukwqu0j2o1cmnvg6gbanpv7xq7j+f...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
any help on the licenses
we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
*LIC-CUCM-USR-A* Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
User-Under 1K
*UCSS-UCM-3-1-A* UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3 years
*CON-ESW-SMS-*1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened
to the plain old DLU's
TIA
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/3957f340/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<503246337.1604411.1368801180897.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
DLUs are the 'old' way of doing things, they moved to user based licensing
beginning with new installs of v7.1(5). What made things a bit confusing was
that they still used DLUs, but sold you user based licensing. I believe that
with version 9, there are no DLUs at all, but I could be wrong.
What you have below are the licenses (LIC-CUCM-USR-A), support (CON-ESW) to
give you minor upgrades, and the software subscription (UCSS-UCM) to give you
major upgrades.
Hope that helps. Others will help as well if I've got things wrong.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "abbas Wali" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 10:14:46 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
any help on the licenses
we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
LIC-CUCM-USR-A Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
User-Under 1K
UCSS-UCM-3-1-A UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
years
CON-ESW-SMS- 1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened to
the plain old DLU's
TIA
--
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/0a17f10b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:34:18 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <[email protected]>
To: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<CAHs2VYs86wa8QGWy6xTqkBzunOSUmUjNVJAp=bvatnacdhf...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
As of 8.5 Alacarte licensing is no more, when you upgraded from 7.x to 8.5
you were converted to UCL licensing (unless you migrated to CUWL), which is
the new AlaCarte. In order to keep maintenance on your cluster all of those
SKUs are needed.
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/partner/WWChannels/technology/ipc/downloads/user_connect_licensing_aag.pdf
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, abbas Wali <[email protected]> wrote:
> any help on the licenses
> we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
>
> *LIC-CUCM-USR-A* Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
> User-Under 1K
>
> *UCSS-UCM-3-1-A* UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
> years
>
> *CON-ESW-SMS-*1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
>
>
> not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened
> to the plain old DLU's
>
> TIA
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/8e882be4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:50:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<186041580.1607379.1368802232480.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
if you order UCSS, you must have ESW.
you can order ESW without UCSS.
i think you are only required to purchase ESW or UCSS if you are already in a
contract. they want to make sure your numbers match up. if you don't have
either ESW or UCSS on your install, then, no, i don't think you are required to
order them.
your account team can help more though.
lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "abbas Wali" <[email protected]>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 10:48:06 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
thanks for that.
is that a must to have ESW with UCSS as I found a reading below.
ESW is a requirement for UCSS. UCSS sits on top of ESW
On 17 May 2013 15:33, Lelio Fulgenzi < [email protected] > wrote:
DLUs are the 'old' way of doing things, they moved to user based licensing
beginning with new installs of v7.1(5). What made things a bit confusing was
that they still used DLUs, but sold you user based licensing. I believe that
with version 9, there are no DLUs at all, but I could be wrong.
What you have below are the licenses (LIC-CUCM-USR-A), support (CON-ESW) to
give you minor upgrades, and the software subscription (UCSS-UCM) to give you
major upgrades.
Hope that helps. Others will help as well if I've got things wrong.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
From: "abbas Wali" < [email protected] >
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 10:14:46 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
any help on the licenses
we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
LIC-CUCM-USR-A Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
User-Under 1K
UCSS-UCM-3-1-A UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
years
CON-ESW-SMS- 1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened to
the plain old DLU's
TIA
--
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--
Abbas Wali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/80d76cd4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:48:06 +0100
From: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<cafdhcp5s4tqaiqorrohbf3k7hjmq3kfqgdrwuvcepy1rnnv...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
thanks for that.
is that a must to have ESW with UCSS as I found a reading below.
ESW is a requirement for UCSS. UCSS sits on top of ESW
On 17 May 2013 15:33, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> DLUs are the 'old' way of doing things, they moved to user based licensing
> beginning with new installs of v7.1(5). What made things a bit confusing
> was that they still used DLUs, but sold you user based licensing. I believe
> that with version 9, there are no DLUs at all, but I could be wrong.
>
> What you have below are the licenses (LIC-CUCM-USR-A), support (CON-ESW)
> to give you minor upgrades, and the software subscription (UCSS-UCM) to
> give you major upgrades.
>
> Hope that helps. Others will help as well if I've got things wrong.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519?824?4120 Ext 56354
> [email protected]
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"abbas Wali" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Friday, May 17, 2013 10:14:46 AM
> *Subject: *[cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
>
>
> any help on the licenses
> we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
>
> *LIC-CUCM-USR-A* Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
> User-Under 1K
>
> *UCSS-UCM-3-1-A* UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
> years
>
> *CON-ESW-SMS-*1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
>
>
> not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened
> to the plain old DLU's
>
> TIA
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
*Abbas Wali*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/091c5c33/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 07:53:13 -0700
From: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] increase volume inbound on MGCP VGW
Message-ID:
<CAHgd+38oVz7C8nL0CGbTAT5JiBHYU=-dukhljg+hoas35uq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have a VGW running MGCP and everyone has suggested that calls into / out
of are soft on the PSTN side of the call.
Currently all VGW's are set to:
input Gain: -2
Output Attenuation : 3
How would I adjust this to make the PSTN side of the call louder? Without
causing echo =)
TIA
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/d4ea041f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:04:08 +0100
From: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
To: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<cafdhcp46d4cf_uc3_z9ceyjmfl2hqodo52+qzl8v7ks-iyx...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
was told that 1 Enhanced user license is almost equal to 5 DLU's in CUCM
version > 9
On 17 May 2013 16:02, Scott Voll <[email protected]> wrote:
> interesting..... we are on 8.6.2 but it looks like we are still on DLU's
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ted Nugent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As of 8.5 Alacarte licensing is no more, when you upgraded from 7.x to
>> 8.5 you were converted to UCL licensing (unless you migrated to CUWL),
>> which is the new AlaCarte. In order to keep maintenance on your cluster all
>> of those SKUs are needed.
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/partner/WWChannels/technology/ipc/downloads/user_connect_licensing_aag.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, abbas Wali <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> any help on the licenses
>>> we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
>>>
>>> *LIC-CUCM-USR-A* Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
>>> User-Under 1K
>>>
>>> *UCSS-UCM-3-1-A* UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
>>> years
>>>
>>> *CON-ESW-SMS-*1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
>>>
>>>
>>> not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what
>>> happened to the plain old DLU's
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
--
*Abbas Wali*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/f126ec4a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/f126ec4a/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:13:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<1929764837.1611900.1368803621276.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
you'll still see DLUs in v8.x, but you can't order them. it was/is very
confusing.
the user count tool has an enhanced license at 6 DLUs and an advanced user at 9
DLUs.
i think the names have changed though since the tool was released.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "abbas Wali" <[email protected]>
To: "Scott Voll" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:04:08 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
was told that 1 Enhanced user license is almost equal to 5 DLU's in CUCM
version > 9
On 17 May 2013 16:02, Scott Voll < [email protected] > wrote:
interesting..... we are on 8.6.2 but it looks like we are still on DLU's
Inline image 1
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ted Nugent < [email protected] > wrote:
As of 8.5 Alacarte licensing is no more, when you upgraded from 7.x to 8.5 you
were converted to UCL licensing (unless you migrated to CUWL), which is the new
AlaCarte. In order to keep maintenance on your cluster all of those SKUs are
needed.
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/partner/WWChannels/technology/ipc/downloads/user_connect_licensing_aag.pdf
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, abbas Wali < [email protected] > wrote:
any help on the licenses
we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
LIC-CUCM-USR-A Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
User-Under 1K
UCSS-UCM-3-1-A UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
years
CON-ESW-SMS- 1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what happened to
the plain old DLU's
TIA
--
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--
Abbas Wali
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/e00de4c4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/e00de4c4/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: Mike Norton <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any
ASCII values in 2013?
Message-ID:
<129686370.1612822.1368803946571.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mike,
I've been tempted to use this for the exact reason you say. However, I've been
hesitant to use something for a purpose it was not intended for. Last thing I
want is to have to remove a feature because it's been changed or removed, etc.
Too bad we just can't have a field that says, "external" callerID or something
like that, either on the phones themselves or the gateways.
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Norton" <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values
in 2013?
In the case of the Call Display values, the ASCII one is what will get sent out
your ISDN gateways. ISDN does not support internationalized caller names, I
assume. (Despite the web UI?s claim, in 8.6 at least, that these fields are for
?Internal Caller ID? that is actually a total lie, there is nothing internal
about it.) Putting different text for the non-ASCII and the ASCII makes for a
handy way to have specific names displayed to internal callees, and generic
business name displayed to external callees. Of course, if you live in a
country where the PSTN ignores the name you send out your ISDN trunk, such as
the U.S., then it doesn?t matter.
For the line text label, it does seem completely useless to have the option of
an ASCII value since it?s not as if the model of phone will dynamically change
to a model that only supports ASCII.
-mn
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: May-16-13 2:50 PM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: [cisco-voip] Display and ASCII Display ? Why fill any ASCII values in
2013?
I don?t see a reason to populate ASCII XXXXXX in a new CallManager 9.x
(3905,89xx, 69xx, 7945/65 and newer)
Are there any Cisco phones/devices that need ASCII because they don?t support
Internationalization (sp?).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_1_1/ccmfeat/CUCM_BK_C3E0EFA0_00_cucm-features-services-guide-91_chapter_0110.html
Display - This field supports internationalization. If your phone does not
support internationalization, the system uses the text that displays in the
Label ASCII field.
ASCII Display ?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/052bcd81/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:17:39 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <[email protected]>
To: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 8.5 DLU's
Message-ID:
<CAHs2VYt+LYeZXVkS7hfZYBh4d=dx1qgbnh4hsx8elgbq-ji...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
You still use DLU in 8.6 but buying PAKs of just DLUs is no more, you need
to purchase UCL or CUWL (which gives you a certain amount of DLUs)... once
you are on 8.5 moving forward you are offically off old school AllaCarte.
(9.x definitely does not have DLUs)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Scott Voll <[email protected]> wrote:
> interesting..... we are on 8.6.2 but it looks like we are still on DLU's
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ted Nugent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As of 8.5 Alacarte licensing is no more, when you upgraded from 7.x to
>> 8.5 you were converted to UCL licensing (unless you migrated to CUWL),
>> which is the new AlaCarte. In order to keep maintenance on your cluster all
>> of those SKUs are needed.
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/partner/WWChannels/technology/ipc/downloads/user_connect_licensing_aag.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, abbas Wali <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> any help on the licenses
>>> we need to purchase phone licesnces for 6900 but given a list as
>>>
>>> *LIC-CUCM-USR-A* Unified Communications Manager Enhanced Single
>>> User-Under 1K
>>>
>>> *UCSS-UCM-3-1-A* UC Manager Enh UCSS Less than 1K users - 1 user - 3
>>> years
>>>
>>> *CON-ESW-SMS-*1 Cisco Smartnet Operate Svs Essential Software
>>>
>>>
>>> not sure which one we need and which one to skip. Dont know what
>>> happened to the plain old DLU's
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/1c539e20/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/1c539e20/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:50:04 +0000
From: "Haas, Neal" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR references
Message-ID:
<3bfada3c46e5a4428c76dc87fcf5fade4a52f...@cofmail03.intra.co.fresno.ca.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
A new CDR vender is contacting us, they are called "CDR-Data", I have never
heard of them. Has anyone used this product? We use ISI-Infortel Select
currently for our CDR collection, its a good solution. I know that there are
some other Telemanagement solutions out there. It seems that the boss wants to
verify that we have a good solution and wants compare to other products on the
market.
I have actually looked at the Splunk product with their add-on CDR product,
looks promising but they don't have the tenant billing yet.
A few solutions would greatly appreciated.
I have looked into: Metopolis - OfficeWatch
CDR-Express
Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130517/750ae996/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 115, Issue 16
*******************************************
