Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: translate called no (Shaihan Jaffrey)
2. Re: translate called no (Erick Wellnitz)
3. hello (Ahmad Riaz Kazmi)
4. CUCM upgrade through PUT (GR)
5. SX20 Quickset license (James Dust)
6. Re: SX20 Quickset license (Ryan Ratliff)
7. Re: CUCM upgrade through PUT (Ryan Ratliff)
8. Re: CUCM upgrade through PUT (Erick Wellnitz)
9. Re: CUCM upgrade through PUT (Ryan Ratliff)
10. Deploying Cisco IP Communicator using freeformdevicename
(Jonathan Charles)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:06:54 +0500
From: Shaihan Jaffrey <[email protected]>
To: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] translate called no
Message-ID:
<capxwygsndtyezwicss+kzngspkoxvwq6omc9lmux5-uo2ot...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Any suggestions.
On 25 Jun 2013 17:28, "Shaihan Jaffrey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> i have a scenario where incoming calls through PSTN need to be translated
> to a UK toll free number and going out thorough a SIP trunk provider.
>
> Please let me know if the below mentioned config on Voice GW is Ok for
> this purpose.
>
>
>
>
>
> voice call send-alert
>
>
>
> voice call carrier capacity active
>
>
>
> voice rtp send-recv
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice service voip
>
>
>
> allow-connections h323 to h323
>
>
>
> allow-connections h323 to sip
>
>
> allow-connections sip to sip
>
>
> allow-connections sip to h323
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> sip
>
>
> rel1xx disable
>
>
> min-se 360
>
>
> header-passing
>
>
> !
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice class codec 10
>
>
>
> codec preference 1 g711ulaw
>
>
>
> codec preference 2 g711alaw
>
>
>
> codec preference 3 g729r8
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice translation-rule 3
>
>
>
> rule 1 /.*/ /12345/ ! ! ! 12345 = UK number
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice translation-profile ITSP_Outgoing
>
>
>
> translate called 1
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice-port 0/0/0
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice-port 0/0/1
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice-port 0/0/2
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> voice-port 0/0/3
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 111 pots
>
>
> translation-profile incoming 1
>
>
>
> incoming called-number .T
>
>
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
>
>
> port 0/0/0
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>
>
>
> destination-pattern .T
>
>
>
> voice-class codec 1
>
>
>
> session protocol sipv2
>
>
> session target ipv4:1.1.1.1 !!!!!! ITSP IP
>
>
> dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify h245-alphanumeric
>
>
> no vad
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130626/315d5700/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:22:09 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: Shaihan Jaffrey <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] translate called no
Message-ID:
<cak0wosba-o-4gcdbwqo_jvp_5hwhn5-spwigqvne9c3sdxt...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
First thing I notice is that your translations are not going to work right
now.
Change 'translate called 1' to 'translate called 3'. You will also need to
change 'translation-profile incoming 1' to 'translation-profile incoming
ITSP_Outgoing'
Take a look at this link for a good read on your translations.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a0080325e8e.shtml
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Shaihan Jaffrey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any suggestions.
> On 25 Jun 2013 17:28, "Shaihan Jaffrey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i have a scenario where incoming calls through PSTN need to be translated
>> to a UK toll free number and going out thorough a SIP trunk provider.
>>
>> Please let me know if the below mentioned config on Voice GW is Ok for
>> this purpose.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> voice call send-alert
>>
>>
>>
>> voice call carrier capacity active
>>
>>
>>
>> voice rtp send-recv
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice service voip
>>
>>
>>
>> allow-connections h323 to h323
>>
>>
>>
>> allow-connections h323 to sip
>>
>>
>> allow-connections sip to sip
>>
>>
>> allow-connections sip to h323
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> sip
>>
>>
>> rel1xx disable
>>
>>
>> min-se 360
>>
>>
>> header-passing
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice class codec 10
>>
>>
>>
>> codec preference 1 g711ulaw
>>
>>
>>
>> codec preference 2 g711alaw
>>
>>
>>
>> codec preference 3 g729r8
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice translation-rule 3
>>
>>
>>
>> rule 1 /.*/ /12345/ ! ! ! 12345 = UK number
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice translation-profile ITSP_Outgoing
>>
>>
>>
>> translate called 1
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice-port 0/0/0
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice-port 0/0/1
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice-port 0/0/2
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> voice-port 0/0/3
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> dial-peer voice 111 pots
>>
>>
>> translation-profile incoming 1
>>
>>
>>
>> incoming called-number .T
>>
>>
>>
>> direct-inward-dial
>>
>>
>>
>> port 0/0/0
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>>
>>
>>
>> destination-pattern .T
>>
>>
>>
>> voice-class codec 1
>>
>>
>>
>> session protocol sipv2
>>
>>
>> session target ipv4:1.1.1.1 !!!!!! ITSP IP
>>
>>
>> dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify h245-alphanumeric
>>
>>
>> no vad
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>> !
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130626/c284d31d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ahmad Riaz Kazmi <[email protected]>
To: j sani <[email protected]>, erfanyousaf <[email protected]>,
z4zee <[email protected]>, cisco voip <[email protected]>,
s4saqibshah <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] hello
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
hello http://m9.jchosting.pl/ohkiwh/ysetyrfv.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130626/77a2f473/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:49:44 +1000
From: GR <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi All,
Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS contract
for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this stage we just
want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through PUT -
1) is it going to cost us anything?
2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the license
keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues here?
3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will it
affect anything?
If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:48:49 +0000
From: James Dust <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] SX20 Quickset license
Message-ID:
<b5861604ffbff545ba7bdd7763e6c3fc54392...@csexmbox04.charles-stanley.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Afternoon all,
We have Cisco telepresence SX20 quickset running on our version 8.6.2 CUCM
infrastructure that we want to apply a multi-site license too (L-SX20-MS).
The thing is once I add the license it doesn't give me any indication (that I
can see) the license has been accepted.
How can I check the Multi-site option has been enabled on the device?
Regards
James
Consider the environment - Think before you print
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may
not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments
are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.
You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent
by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where
applicable), can be found at this URL
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/ab9aa9e5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:41:24 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: James Dust <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SX20 Quickset license
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
On the web page of the SX20 (home section) you should see MultiSite listed in
the "Installed options" section.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:48 AM, James Dust <[email protected]>
wrote:
Afternoon all,
We have Cisco telepresence SX20 quickset running on our version 8.6.2 CUCM
infrastructure that we want to apply a multi-site license too (L-SX20-MS).
The thing is once I add the license it doesn?t give me any indication (that I
can see) the license has been accepted.
How can I check the Multi-site option has been enabled on the device?
Regards
James
Consider the environment - Think before you print
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may
not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments
are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.
You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent
by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where
applicable), can be found at this URL
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/e367bc1c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sx20-multisite.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25965 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/e367bc1c/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:44:14 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: GR <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues
> here?
There are no longer any node licenses for CUCM as of version 9. You would
simply point your lab publisher to your production ELM and it can share
licenses with no issues.
There are specific demo/lab orders you can place but if you have the install
media and spare licenses in ELM then I'd go ahead and build up the lab cluster
without any worries. I don't know what restrictions PUT may impose as far as
the number of upgrades, etc.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:49 AM, GR <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS contract
for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this stage we just
want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through PUT -
1) is it going to cost us anything?
2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the license
keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues here?
3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will it
affect anything?
If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/9af901b9/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:36:46 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: GR <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID:
<cak0woscf8oxpkn6aqskgitkvpovy1kxpshp-po5v36kqjku...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
As long as you don't register the PAK(s) with the license mac of the
lab you'll be fine for production.
The one caveat is that 9.x 'trial' is time limited although time is
relative. The official way is to purchase a lab license.
1. No, but you may want to purchase a lab license to avoid playing father
time every so often.
2. As long as you don't register the PAK(s) to the lab license mac
everything will be fine
3. The media/iso is re-useable. No need to re-order in the future unless
there is a newer release. At that time you would register teh PAK to the
production license mac.
PUT process:
Select the product you want
Enter the quantity you want
Select E-delivery or physical
Verify information and submit.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:49 AM, GR <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS
> contract for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this
> stage we just want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through
> PUT -
> 1) is it going to cost us anything?
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any
> issues here?
> 3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will
> it affect anything?
>
> If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/01508021/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:32:09 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
There's also a 6 month demo license available via the licensing tool.
Cisco Unified Communications Demo License Version 9.x
- 20 CUWL PRO Unified Communications Manager licenses
- 20 CUWL PRO Unity Connection licenses
- 5 TelePresence Room licenses
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]> wrote:
Good to know! Thanks for the clarification!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues
> here?
There are no longer any node licenses for CUCM as of version 9. You would
simply point your lab publisher to your production ELM and it can share
licenses with no issues.
There are specific demo/lab orders you can place but if you have the install
media and spare licenses in ELM then I'd go ahead and build up the lab cluster
without any worries. I don't know what restrictions PUT may impose as far as
the number of upgrades, etc.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:49 AM, GR <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS contract
for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this stage we just
want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through PUT -
1) is it going to cost us anything?
2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the license
keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues here?
3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will it
affect anything?
If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/8d917548/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:30:17 -0500
From: Jonathan Charles <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Deploying Cisco IP Communicator using
freeformdevicename
Message-ID:
<caplpvzjsf9mi1d_bggbavwbsd5_4aixxhrywer_c-cztk-c...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
We are deploying Cisco IP Communicator 8.6.3 to about a 1000 uses using
their AD user ID as the freeformdevicename for the device name.
How can we deploy this, using the msi, automatically and set it based on
logged in userID?
The deployment guide is remarkably spartan on deployment options.
Any ideas?
Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/e293fdc4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 116, Issue 26
*******************************************
