Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: CUCM upgrade through PUT (Erick Wellnitz)
2. CFA on 9971 (Candese Perez)
3. Re: CFA on 9971 (Ryan Ratliff)
4. Re: CFA on 9971 (Candese Perez)
5. Re: CFA on 9971 (Ryan Ratliff)
6. Re: CFA on 9971 (Ryan Ratliff)
7. Re: CFA on 9971 (Candese Perez)
8. CUCM 9 incoming SIP trunk to queue: early media problem
(Carlos G Mendioroz)
9. RIP 1025 (Jason Aarons (AM))
10. Call Manger drops calls (Akbari-Javar, Frank)
11. Re: CUCM upgrade through PUT (GR)
12. Re: CUCM 9 incoming SIP trunk to queue: early media problem
(Ryan Ratliff)
13. foreign telecom regulations (Erick Wellnitz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:09:43 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID:
<cak0wosdpab9c15rnfn7c1eebnc5r-vzd7tcb27xj_sqtzwr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Good to know! Thanks for the clarification!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any
> issues here?
>
>
> There are no longer any node licenses for CUCM as of version 9. You would
> simply point your lab publisher to your production ELM and it can share
> licenses with no issues.
>
> There are specific demo/lab orders you can place but if you have the
> install media and spare licenses in ELM then I'd go ahead and build up the
> lab cluster without any worries. I don't know what restrictions PUT may
> impose as far as the number of upgrades, etc.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:49 AM, GR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS
> contract for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this
> stage we just want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through
> PUT -
> 1) is it going to cost us anything?
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any
> issues here?
> 3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will
> it affect anything?
>
> If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/0ec38fa0/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:21:20 -0500
From: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID:
<camahmvlbfbmw9gjrnh2ftj77pcfzcqwljw7rw7iasekjb+_...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a 9971.
It is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature doesn't
exist their either.
I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/2f295328/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:34:45 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Try creating a feature control policy with Forward All enabled and set it on
the device. By default that option should be enabled.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a 9971. It
is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature doesn't
exist their either.
I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/db84367d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:39:49 -0500
From: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID:
<CAMAHmVJMdMAwFbUDXQA3KpbOVQBb3QV1+9ha=vncphajpkk...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I tried that as well, i did see it enabled by default in the feature
control policy, but I selected override and enabled, but I still don't see
the feature under unassociated items.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Try creating a feature control policy with Forward All enabled and set it
> on the device. By default that option should be enabled.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a 9971.
> It is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
> I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature doesn't
> exist their either.
>
> I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
>
> Has anyone else seen this?
>
> TIA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/6cf1667c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:51:46 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Are you trying to add Forward All as a feature button (the left-hand buttons)?
It cannot be added there, only to the softkeys along the bottom of the screen,
and that is controlled via feature control policy.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
I tried that as well, i did see it enabled by default in the feature control
policy, but I selected override and enabled, but I still don't see the feature
under unassociated items.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
Try creating a feature control policy with Forward All enabled and set it on
the device. By default that option should be enabled.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a 9971. It
is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature doesn't
exist their either.
I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/fd40e031/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:04:33 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The phone should update with an apply config.
Associate the phone to your userid and then point your browser to
http://phone.ip.address/CGI/Screenshot to confirm. Use the userid you
associated the phone to for authentication.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
Both, but I can only really see the feature button.
Is there a step I am missing with the softkey? If I simply add the feature to
the feature control policy will it display on the phone?
I am not physically located with these phones so I cannot see the screen when
updated.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
Are you trying to add Forward All as a feature button (the left-hand buttons)?
It cannot be added there, only to the softkeys along the bottom of the screen,
and that is controlled via feature control policy.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
I tried that as well, i did see it enabled by default in the feature control
policy, but I selected override and enabled, but I still don't see the feature
under unassociated items.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
Try creating a feature control policy with Forward All enabled and set it on
the device. By default that option should be enabled.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a 9971. It
is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature doesn't
exist their either.
I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/1f57adec/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:55:41 -0500
From: Candese Perez <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] VOIP" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CFA on 9971
Message-ID:
<camahmvk-by4gs6ftyh7ehouwuduvtq8zez08fa+emmetpoy...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Both, but I can only really see the feature button.
Is there a step I am missing with the softkey? If I simply add the
feature to the feature control policy will it display on the phone?
I am not physically located with these phones so I cannot see the screen
when updated.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you trying to add Forward All as a feature button (the left-hand
> buttons)? It cannot be added there, only to the softkeys along the bottom
> of the screen, and that is controlled via feature control policy.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I tried that as well, i did see it enabled by default in the feature
> control policy, but I selected override and enabled, but I still don't see
> the feature under unassociated items.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Try creating a feature control policy with Forward All enabled and set
>> it on the device. By default that option should be enabled.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Candese Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am having an issue adding the Call Forward All functionality to a
>> 9971. It is not present under Unassigned Associated Items for the phone.
>> I have tried creating a new phone button template, but the feature
>> doesn't exist their either.
>>
>> I don''t have a feature control policy assigned to the device.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen this?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/19a3e41a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:31:13 -0300
From: Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]>
To: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9 incoming SIP trunk to queue: early media
problem
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
I'm playing with using the "new" queue feature to do a simple welcome
message before attendant. Works a treat for inside calls, but CUCM is
doing early media (183 progress with SDP) for the message and my ITSP is
not cutting the audio through :(
I've found no way to tell CUCM to accept the call right away. Is there any ?
TIA,
--
Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]> LW7 EQI Argentina
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:41:05 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] RIP 1025
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Wish to pay my respects for what Stuart Biggs, first CCIE accomplished.
http://m.networkworld.com/community/node/83288
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130627/55ae141f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 02:00:45 +0000
From: "Akbari-Javar, Frank" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Call Manger drops calls
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Has someone seen the following error and how it is caused:
Relatively significant number of calls that get back a response code 487 for
"Call Terminated or Cancelled". Does anybody know what might cause a call to
fail with this reason code?
Thank you all in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130628/1906437f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:58:18 +1000
From: GR <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>, Erick Wellnitz
<[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM upgrade through PUT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks very much guys.
Sent from my iPhone
On 28/06/2013, at 1:32 AM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's also a 6 month demo license available via the licensing tool.
>
> Cisco Unified Communications Demo License Version 9.x
>
> - 20 CUWL PRO Unified Communications Manager licenses
> - 20 CUWL PRO Unity Connection licenses
> - 5 TelePresence Room licenses
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Good to know! Thanks for the clarification!
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
>> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues
>> here?
>
> There are no longer any node licenses for CUCM as of version 9. You would
> simply point your lab publisher to your production ELM and it can share
> licenses with no issues.
>
> There are specific demo/lab orders you can place but if you have the install
> media and spare licenses in ELM then I'd go ahead and build up the lab
> cluster without any worries. I don't know what restrictions PUT may impose
> as far as the number of upgrades, etc.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:49 AM, GR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Trying to get upgrade software for cucm 9.1 for lab. We have the UCSS
> contract for our production CUCM and are entitled to upgrade. But at this
> stage we just want to upgrade the lab cucm, if we order the upgrade through
> PUT -
> 1) is it going to cost us anything?
> 2) will it affect license keys for the production CUCM? I mean will the
> license keys be rehosted or invalidated for current system etc. - any issues
> here?
> 3) when we order in future for production cucm- can we order again? Will it
> affect anything?
>
> If someone can explain PUT process would be really helpful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130628/332b106a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 06:46:33 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9 incoming SIP trunk to queue: early
media problem
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Not for the early announcement feature for hunt pilots, no.
-Ryan
On Jun 27, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with using the "new" queue feature to do a simple welcome
message before attendant. Works a treat for inside calls, but CUCM is
doing early media (183 progress with SDP) for the message and my ITSP is
not cutting the audio through :(
I've found no way to tell CUCM to accept the call right away. Is there any ?
TIA,
--
Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]> LW7 EQI Argentina
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130628/4c3c294a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:05:39 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] foreign telecom regulations
Message-ID:
<cak0wosdqryse4t5g8tdzsujntfvpo-axtak5lyp6swrnvjx...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello all and happy Friday!
I think my google-fu is off today as I cannot seem to find the below
information.
Does anyone happen to know or know of a good resource to determine a few
items for foreign telecom regulations? These are, TEHO out of the country
and call recording regulations. The locales are Singapore, Hong Kong,
Tokyo and Australia.
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130628/0c88783f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 116, Issue 27
*******************************************
