Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: local route group question (Divin John (dijohn))
2. Re: local route group question (Divin John (dijohn))
3. Re: local route group question (Erick Wellnitz)
4. Re: local route group question (Erick Wellnitz)
5. Re: local route group question (Matthew Loraditch)
6. Re: local route group question (Heim, Dennis)
7. Re: fast busy when phone CFA via CUBE (Erick Wellnitz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:04:53 +0000
From: "Divin John (dijohn)" <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>, Erick
Wellnitz <[email protected]>, cisco-voip
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
Regards,
Divin
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>, cisco-voip
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
That?s from a 9.1 install.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
Email Support
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
t>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
or does it only work properly for live calls?
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:13:35 +0000
From: "Divin John (dijohn)" <[email protected]>
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Hi Erick,
Looks like it will show the LRG. But not the actual gateways in it.
<B>Symptom:</B>
DNA results just show 'Local Route Group' but do not show the devices in the
route
group. The problem is that DNA does not do a search to determine the appropriate
LRG for the selected calling device.
<B>Conditions:</B>
Occurs if doing an analysis of a pattern that points to a route list containing
the
Standard Local Route Group.
<B>Workaround:</B>
Manually look at the device pool for the calling device to determine the
configured
route group for that device, then manually look at the settings of those
devices to
determine any transformations.
I hope its clear now,
Regards,
Divin
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Saturday, 3 August 2013 12:52 AM
To: Divin John <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
It works in my 9.1.1 version.[Inline image 1]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Divin John (dijohn)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi All,
We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
Regards,
Divin
From: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
That?s from a 9.1 install.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830<tel:410.252.8830>
fax. 410.252.9284<tel:410.252.9284>
Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
Email Support
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
t>
From: cisco-voip
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
or does it only work properly for live calls?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/271ed834/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DNA.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11980 bytes
Desc: DNA.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/271ed834/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:22:37 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: "Divin John (dijohn)" <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<cak0wosdkewiuz6x8bffbjgmok_z78isd10sus-aqp-xsnc+...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
It works in my 9.1.1 version.[image: Inline image 1]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Divin John (dijohn) <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
> this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
>
> Regards,
>
> Divin
>
>
> From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
> To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>, cisco-voip
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
>
>
> DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
> http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
> That?s from a 9.1 install.
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
>
> voice. 410.252.8830
> fax. 410.252.9284
>
> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
> Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
> Email Support
> <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
> t>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
> To: cisco-voip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
>
> Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
> or does it only work properly for live calls?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/73050d35/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DNA.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11980 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/73050d35/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:30:14 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: "Divin John (dijohn)" <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<cak0wosbapggrba1jw8qgjscvaxffcvp1q0c8c9t4l+dga7h...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I snipped it short of the gateway but it also shows the gateway. My
earlier issue was due to a misconfiguration, which is why DNA was wrong.
Calls routed but not to the expected RL/GW. I resolved the configuration
issue and now it looks to be working.
gateway. [image: Inline image 2]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Divin John (dijohn) <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> Looks like it will show the LRG. But not the actual gateways in it.
>
> <B>Symptom:</B>
> DNA results just show 'Local Route Group' but do not show the devices in the
> route
> group. The problem is that DNA does not do a search to determine the
> appropriate
> LRG for the selected calling device.
>
> <B>Conditions:</B>
> Occurs if doing an analysis of a pattern that points to a route list
> containing the
> Standard Local Route Group.
>
> <B>Workaround:</B>
> Manually look at the device pool for the calling device to determine the
> configured
> route group for that device, then manually look at the settings of those
> devices to
> determine any transformations.
>
> I hope its clear now,
>
> Regards,
>
> Divin
>
>
> From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, 3 August 2013 12:52 AM
> To: Divin John <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>, cisco-voip <
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
>
> It works in my 9.1.1 version.[image: Inline image 1]
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Divin John (dijohn) <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
>> this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Divin
>>
>>
>> From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
>> Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
>> To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>, cisco-voip
>> <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
>>
>>
>> DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
>> http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
>> That?s from a 9.1 install.
>>
>>
>> Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>>
>> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>> Timonium, MD 21093
>>
>> voice. 410.252.8830
>> fax. 410.252.9284
>>
>> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
>> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
>> Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
>> Email Support
>> <mailto:[email protected]
>> ?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
>> t>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
>> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
>> To: cisco-voip
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
>>
>> Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
>> or does it only work properly for live calls?
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/46f2c67d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DNA.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11980 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/46f2c67d/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DNA2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/46f2c67d/attachment-0003.png>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:39:10 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>, "Divin John (dijohn)"
<[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Interesting, my destinations are trunks to CUBE routers. I wonder if that's why
they don't show up for me. I will have to check that out
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: Erick Wellnitz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Divin John (dijohn)
Cc: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
I snipped it short of the gateway but it also shows the gateway. My earlier
issue was due to a misconfiguration, which is why DNA was wrong. Calls routed
but not to the expected RL/GW. I resolved the configuration issue and now it
looks to be working.
gateway. [Inline image 2]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Divin John (dijohn)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Erick,
Looks like it will show the LRG. But not the actual gateways in it.
<B>Symptom:</B>
DNA results just show 'Local Route Group' but do not show the devices in the
route
group. The problem is that DNA does not do a search to determine the appropriate
LRG for the selected calling device.
<B>Conditions:</B>
Occurs if doing an analysis of a pattern that points to a route list containing
the
Standard Local Route Group.
<B>Workaround:</B>
Manually look at the device pool for the calling device to determine the
configured
route group for that device, then manually look at the settings of those
devices to
determine any transformations.
I hope its clear now,
Regards,
Divin
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Saturday, 3 August 2013 12:52 AM
To: Divin John <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
It works in my 9.1.1 version.[Inline image 1]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Divin John (dijohn)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi All,
We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
Regards,
Divin
From: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
That?s from a 9.1 install.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830<tel:410.252.8830>
fax. 410.252.9284<tel:410.252.9284>
Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
Email Support
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
t>
From: cisco-voip
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
or does it only work properly for live calls?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/ddbfd5b0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32552 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/ddbfd5b0/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11980 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/ddbfd5b0/attachment-0003.png>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:26:17 -0500
From: "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>, Erick
Wellnitz <[email protected]>, "Divin John (dijohn)"
<[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
DNA ignores called/calling transformations patterns along with Device Mobility.
Additionally, as others have discussed it simply says Local Route Group, but
does not show the substitution for which route group/trunk was used.
Dennis Heim | Sr. Unified Collaboration Team Lead & Solution Architect
World Wide Technology | 314.212.1814 |
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
"Creating Impact, Ignition & Scalability"
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:39 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz; Divin John (dijohn)
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Interesting, my destinations are trunks to CUBE routers. I wonder if that's why
they don't show up for me. I will have to check that out
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: Erick Wellnitz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Divin John (dijohn)
Cc: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
I snipped it short of the gateway but it also shows the gateway. My earlier
issue was due to a misconfiguration, which is why DNA was wrong. Calls routed
but not to the expected RL/GW. I resolved the configuration issue and now it
looks to be working.
gateway. [cid:[email protected]]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Divin John (dijohn)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Erick,
Looks like it will show the LRG. But not the actual gateways in it.
<B>Symptom:</B>
DNA results just show 'Local Route Group' but do not show the devices in the
route
group. The problem is that DNA does not do a search to determine the appropriate
LRG for the selected calling device.
<B>Conditions:</B>
Occurs if doing an analysis of a pattern that points to a route list containing
the
Standard Local Route Group.
<B>Workaround:</B>
Manually look at the device pool for the calling device to determine the
configured
route group for that device, then manually look at the settings of those
devices to
determine any transformations.
I hope its clear now,
Regards,
Divin
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Saturday, 3 August 2013 12:52 AM
To: Divin John <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
It works in my 9.1.1 version.[cid:[email protected]]
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Divin John (dijohn)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi All,
We have CSCui45645 (DNA does not show local route group information) for
this issue. As this is an enhancement request, there's no ETA as of now.
Regards,
Divin
From: Matthew Loraditch
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, 2 August 2013 10:15 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
cisco-voip
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] local route group question
DNA doesn?t go past the SLRG and show the actual RG chosen.
http://imgur.com/3W0bMcP
That?s from a 9.1 install.
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830<tel:410.252.8830>
fax. 410.252.9284<tel:410.252.9284>
Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
Email Support
<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject=Technical%20Support%20Reques
t>
From: cisco-voip
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:15 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] local route group question
Does anyone know if using DNA will invoke the local route group properly
or does it only work properly for live calls?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/249adc57/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32552 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/249adc57/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11980 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/249adc57/attachment-0003.png>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:35:09 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] fast busy when phone CFA via CUBE
Message-ID:
<CAK0wOsB=c6r_pbvwrm9mf80zg9-t9hjjgv6c1ksar+0lg9q...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Just tested. It wasn't the MPT setup. It's kind of convoluted on the
Nortel side and we think the CUBE doesn't know how to route back to the
Nortel.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah no. Capabilities mismatch requires either MTP/Transcoder.****
>
> ** **
>
> You should be able to see in Wireshark your SDP being sent and what codecs
> to confirm. AVP 0 is G711 and AVP 18 is G729.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTP_Audio_Video_Profiles****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:35 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] fast busy when phone CFA via CUBE****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> I have an issue which is probably very easy to fix but I think I'm making
> it more complex than I need to.****
>
> ****
>
> I have a Nortel that we are migrating to CUCM 9.1 from. In the interim,
> we have interated the two using SIP via CUBE. PSTN gateway is H323. I
> wouldn't normally do this but decisions get made and we have to deal with
> it.****
>
> ****
>
> Call from Nortel to IP Phone works fine. Call forward that same IP Phone
> to a PSTN number and the call connects to the external number as if nothing
> was wrong but the Nortel phone gets dropped with a 'fast busy'.****
>
> ****
>
> Traces and TAC (626731957) that my colleague opened seem to show a codec
> /capabilities mismatch but I can't find a codec mismatch in the system at
> all and our reporting/monitoring tool shows the call trying to connect as
> G711u on both sides.****
>
> ****
>
> Is this a situation where an MTP is gong to be necessary or is there a way
> to avoid mandatory MTP?****
>
> ****
>
> Thanks in advance! ****
>
>
>
> itevomcid ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130802/515093e3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 118, Issue 3
******************************************
