Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party instead of
original dialed number (Dana Tong)
2. Re: Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party
instead of original dialed number (Florian Kroessbacher)
3. Re: Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party
instead of original dialed number (Dana Tong)
4. Re: 3905 SIP Hearing Aid issues?? Anyone else got reports of
this? (Ryan Ratliff (rratliff))
5. Re: 9971 SIP phone - no audio on calls between cluster to
PSTN for certain phone numbers (Erick B.)
6. Re: Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party
instead of original dialed number (Justin Steinberg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:14:33 +0000
From: Dana Tong <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected] ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
party instead of original dialed number
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Good morning,
Would anyone have a quick fix for this problem.
Outbound calls via a H.323 gateway show the connected party instead of the
original dialled number.
Have tried setting the "Always Display Original Dialed Number" to True on the
Service Parameters but doesn't keep for transferred calls.
It also screws up the display for extension to extension transfers. Ie 7123
calls 7122 who transfers to 7190 but it shows 7122 on the calling party.
Is there something on the voice gateway that could be sending the caller id
back to CUCM? This was an upgrade to the CUCM but I have not made any other
changes to the configuration of the voice gateways.
Cheers
Dana
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/5da8ffd2/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Florian Kroessbacher" <[email protected]>
To: "Dana Tong" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
party instead of original dialed number
Message-ID: <1376889759435.4c70a4fe@Nodemailer>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
hy
have you tried this on h323 gw
voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
--
Florian Kroessbacher
gmail: [email protected]
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dana Tong <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Good morning,
> Would anyone have a quick fix for this problem.
> Outbound calls via a H.323 gateway show the connected party instead of the
> original dialled number.
> Have tried setting the "Always Display Original Dialed Number" to True on the
> Service Parameters but doesn't keep for transferred calls.
> It also screws up the display for extension to extension transfers. Ie 7123
> calls 7122 who transfers to 7190 but it shows 7122 on the calling party.
> Is there something on the voice gateway that could be sending the caller id
> back to CUCM? This was an upgrade to the CUCM but I have not made any other
> changes to the configuration of the voice gateways.
> Cheers
> Dana
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130818/113c1176/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:57:41 +0000
From: Dana Tong <[email protected]>
To: Florian Kroessbacher <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
party instead of original dialed number
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Awesome. That?s great thanks. Just what we were after.
Cheers
Dana
From: Florian Kroessbacher [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 19 August 2013 3:23 PM
To: Dana Tong
Cc: [email protected] ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party
instead of original dialed number
hy
have you tried this on h323 gw
voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
--
Florian Kroessbacher
gmail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dana Tong
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Good morning,
Would anyone have a quick fix for this problem.
Outbound calls via a H.323 gateway show the connected party instead of the
original dialled number.
Have tried setting the ?Always Display Original Dialed Number? to True on the
Service Parameters but doesn?t keep for transferred calls.
It also screws up the display for extension to extension transfers. Ie 7123
calls 7122 who transfers to 7190 but it shows 7122 on the calling party.
Is there something on the voice gateway that could be sending the caller id
back to CUCM? This was an upgrade to the CUCM but I have not made any other
changes to the configuration of the voice gateways.
Cheers
Dana
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/37893f9f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:06:30 +0000
From: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 SIP Hearing Aid issues?? Anyone else
got reports of this?
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>From what I could gather this phone tested at 13db.
If there isn't already a TAC SR please have the customer open one and let me
know the SR number.
Thanks,
-Ryan
On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Jason Aarons (AM)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Users with hearing aids are complaining that 3905 phones are a problem. Any
else had this reported? I?ve sent it to the Cisco AM/SE.
The PDI Helpdesk confirmed the 3905 meets the ADA specs in regards to 12dB gain
, users with hearing aids are none the less complaining. They state it?
requires them to hold the handset at odd angles?
3905 ADA Specs
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/responsibility/accessibility/downloads/vpats
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/responsibility/accessibility/downloads/vpats/VPAT-Cisco3905_6900-v4.doc
Cisco IP Phones meets the FCC 68 requirements for volume gain of minimum of
12dB of gain from default factor setting. To achieve 20dB or greater, Cisco
recommends using an inline amplifier,
>From end user;
Hi Jason
We have heard from several clients that are having problems using the Cisco
phones (3905) with a hearing aid. Problems reported are as follows:
Volume somewhat adequate, but handset needs to be positioned at an awkward
angle.
Hearing aid cuts off while using the phone.
"Feedback" on the hearing aid requiring adjustments of the client. The
feedback does not happen on the analog phone.
This is definitely an ADA issue that we need to have solved. What does Cisco
recommend to remedy the problem from an ADA compliancy perspective.
Thanks,
CustomerX
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/f139178d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:14:40 -0500
From: "Erick B." <[email protected]>
To: Carlo <[email protected]>
Cc: voip puck <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 9971 SIP phone - no audio on calls between
cluster to PSTN for certain phone numbers
Message-ID:
<CAHSnBQwduASsMQCxAZCFW_-=qbju_groxjrkkeshej7ofks...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
BTW, Upgrading to 8.6.2a SU3 resolved this issue. No changes other then
the SU patch. Not really seeing a bug on this in the release notes that
stands out as problem but it's fixed.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Carlo <[email protected]>wrote:
> are you running mulitcast?
> I ran into almost the same problem. calls going from SIP to H323 back to
> SIP. works find until I have to transfer or put them on hold.
> When you make the call and you don't get any audio, try putting the call
> on hold then pick it back up and see if you get audio.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 12:49 PM, "Erick B." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would see that on a SCCP phone to right? I'll have them check the 9971
> (not at the location I am at).
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Wes Sisk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Watch the phone UI, does audio start before the status line goes to
>> connected?
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Erick B. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It is an external number (not ours) and audio starts right away so
>> possibly. I could verify with SIP debug.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Wes Sisk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does the IVR cut through audio before the call goes into the connected
>>> state?
>>> -Wes
>>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Erick B. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone have idea here?
>>>
>>> Have a system with 2 CUCM clusters.
>>>
>>> Cluster 1 is CUCM version 8.6.2.22900-9 with SIP CUBE to ITSP
>>>
>>> Cluster 2 is CUCM version 8.6.2.20000-2
>>>
>>> ICT between the clusters (Non Gatekeeper controlled).
>>>
>>> SCCP phones on Cluster 2 can call outbound to numbers over the ICT and
>>> out CUBE GW fine. When a 9971 places call to same number, the call connects
>>> but no audio is heard.
>>> If we put the 9971 on Cluster 1 (no ICT) and same number is called it
>>> works fine.
>>>
>>> I've been over the release notes for 8.62a SU1 to SU3 and not finding
>>> anything yet and have recreated the ICT and reset it. The trunk seems to be
>>> fine since the SCCP phones work for calling the few numbers the 9971 has
>>> trouble with. The 9971 can call most numbers just fine. 9971 is on current
>>> firmware version to. Looking for ideas before trying to do SU3 to see if it
>>> helps.
>>>
>>> The number being called is a IVR with menu, etc.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/e9b7b46e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:57:03 -0400
From: Justin Steinberg <[email protected]>
To: Dana Tong <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
party instead of original dialed number
Message-ID:
<caccaghaxv1reurxpej0inrf1ovxwwmzpdnc9t_xl4uy-dk4...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Is there a similar command for SIP ?
I was not able to figure out a way to do this with SIP last time I tried.
On Aug 19, 2013 1:59 AM, "Dana Tong" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Awesome. That?s great thanks. Just what we were after.****
>
>
> Cheers****
>
> Dana****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Florian Kroessbacher [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, 19 August 2013 3:23 PM
> *To:* Dana Tong
> *Cc:* [email protected] ([email protected])
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
> party instead of original dialed number****
>
> ** **
>
> hy****
>
> ** **
>
> have you tried this on h323 gw****
>
> ** **
>
> voice service voip ****
>
> no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Florian Kroessbacher
> gmail: [email protected]****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dana Tong <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> Good morning,****
>
> ****
>
> Would anyone have a quick fix for this problem. ****
>
> ****
>
> Outbound calls via a H.323 gateway show the connected party instead of the
> original dialled number.****
>
> ****
>
> Have tried setting the ?*Always Display Original Dialed Number*? to True
> on the Service Parameters but doesn?t keep for transferred calls. ****
>
> ****
>
> It also screws up the display for extension to extension transfers. Ie
> 7123 calls 7122 who transfers to 7190 but it shows 7122 on the calling
> party.****
>
> ****
>
> Is there something on the voice gateway that could be sending the caller
> id back to CUCM? This was an upgrade to the CUCM but I have not made any
> other changes to the configuration of the voice gateways.****
>
> ****
>
> Cheers****
>
> Dana****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/0d78f15a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 118, Issue 16
*******************************************
