What's the full CUCM version you were on and what's the ES version you were trying to install? You can't install a lower CUCM version but the ES may actually by a newer version than what you're currently on.
Brian On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Pedersen <peders...@bennettjones.com>wrote: > So the ES I was given failed to install. CUCM wouldn't accept it because > it was a lower version number, and I didn't see anything in the readme > about this. I'm waiting to see what TAC has to say. Has anyone installed a > lower version number CUCM patch? > > > > *From:* Brian Meade (brmeade) [mailto:brme...@cisco.com<brme...@cisco.com>] > > *Sent:* 19 February 2014 4:40 PM > *To:* Eric Pedersen; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* RE: CUCM engineering special versions > > > > Eric, > > > > The SU version numbers don't exactly line up with the ES version numbers. > > > > 9.1.2.11900-12 (9.1.2 SU1) was actually built off of the 9.1.2.11006-1 > Engineering Special so the 9.1.2.11021.1 ES he told you to go to will > indeed be a newer release. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > *From:* cisco-voip > [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>] > *On Behalf Of *Eric Pedersen > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:13 PM > *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions > > > > TAC is suggesting we go to CUCM 9.1.2. 11021.1, which is an engineering > special, to fix a defect. We're already on 9.1.2 SU1. The version number > for this is 9.1.2.11900-12 which is higher than the ES. I thought patches > always meant going up in version numbers. Do SU versions work differently > than ESs or is the engineer offering the wrong version? > > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged > > subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact > > the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, > > e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized > > parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please > > notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such > > notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to > > communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures > > (such as encryption) unless specifically requested. > > > > The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged > subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact > the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, > e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized > parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please > notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such > notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to > communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures > (such as encryption) unless specifically requested. > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip