As Brian said, that's expected behavior, and you really wouldn't want it to work any different, otherwise globalized/localized designs would break.
Another very simple option is to put a new shared line on these four phones, and when they want to show their real number, they call from their real line, and when they don't then they call from the shared line. Now, if you need the masked number to show "Private" then the translation pattern approach submitted by Brian is the easiest in my opinion. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Countryman, Edward < edward.country...@presencehealth.org> wrote: > We need to “hide” or change the extension number of a small group of > cisco phones when they are dialing internally (4 digits) to another phone. > > > > Our thought was to use a calling party transformation pattern for this, > which appears to work fine when alerting and connected to the called number. > > > > However, the call history directory on the receiving phone (the one that > see’s the transformed calling number not the real calling number) reflects > the real number. > > > > This doesn’t seem to make sense and defeats the whole purpose. what are we > missing?? > > > > Do you know of a better way to approach this request? > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
