I agree w Lelio
— Sent from Mailbox On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > I think shared lines are gonna cause you more grief. Especially if they're > centrally located, in quadrants so to speak. Guessing out loud, an emergency > is probably going to affect multiple people, in the same area, think fire. If > it's a shared line in a quadrant, all those people are going to want to dial > 911. Outbound calling with shared lines is not the best. > I think you should consider creating a separate partition, and using those > for your logged out extensions. They're not dialable by anything but the > system processes that needs to dial them. Because it's a system process > dialing them, they don't have to even be the same length, since interdigit > dialing does not come into play. Actually a different length would be better > so you don't have duplicates. > If you really must be able to dial them from other phones, than you can use > dialing codes, say *99-123 will reach logged out extension 123. > Just some thoughts. > --- > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. > Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 > [email protected] > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Voll" <[email protected]> > To: "Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)" <[email protected]> > Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:20:04 AM > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT > how about a shared line per floor? > Scott > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) < [email protected] > > wrote: > And no, you can't put a shared line on 1300 phones. Use a different DN range > or something and let CER handle the translations for you just like it would > any other phone. > -Ryan > On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Erick Wellnitz < [email protected] > > wrote: > Use a partition that isn't accessible by anything except CER CTI ports. > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Scott Voll < [email protected] > wrote: > <blockquote> > OK I get the picture....... > So if I'm going to put a line on all phones, can I put a shared line on all > 1300 phones? If so, how does CER work? will the PSAP call back the line or > does it call back the phone? > I have a dialing plan that doesn't allow for much in the way of non DID > numbers so have a very limited amount to use. > TIA > Scott > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) < [email protected] > wrote: > <blockquote> > Agreed with Ryan, Anthony, and Erick. > Give the phones DN’s, even just internal DN’s. It is “burning a DN” in the > sense that number is allocated. That number does not have to be a DID. Give > the phones/lines a CSS that PLAR’s to a help desk. Or at least allow them to > invoke local emergency services - private or public. > -Wes > On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:13 PM, Erick Wellnitz < [email protected] > > wrote: > Not having lines on a physical phone can be a career altering decision if > someone needs to dial emergency services and they grab the nearest logged out > phone. There could also be legal issues but I'm not a lawyer so take that for > what you will. > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Anthony Holloway < > [email protected] > wrote: > <blockquote> > That's a "Yes" for my experiences. The logout profile or default state of the > phone has a nonDID in most cases, DID in a few cases (with a CSS restriction > for Internal and EMS), and the UDP of the user has a DID in most cases, > nonDID in a few cases (with typical CSS). > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Scott Voll < [email protected] > wrote: > <blockquote> > So what are people doing in a Extension Mobility only environment? Burning > two DN's? one for the user and one for every phone? > scott > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) < > [email protected] > wrote: > <blockquote> > Auto-reg will provision lines as well, and I agree with Anthony. > I don't think anyone wants to deal with the potential issue of somebody > picking up a phone to dial emergency services and not getting dialtone. > -Ryan > On Oct 29, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Anthony Holloway < > [email protected] > wrote: > Scott, > SIP or SCCP, either way, for emergency reasons you don't want phones laying > about, unable to save a life when people depend on the reliability of 911. > Here's one option without knowing your environment design or limitations: > Setup Auto Registration and then Bulk Delete all the phones. > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) < [email protected] > > wrote: > <blockquote> > All phones? SIP phones won't register without a line. > -Ryan > On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Scott Voll < [email protected] > wrote: > is there a way to bulk delete all lines on all phones? > we are moving to extension mobility and want to remove all the lines on all > the phones > Thanks > scott > CM 8.6.2 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > </blockquote> > </blockquote> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > </blockquote> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > </blockquote> > </blockquote> > </blockquote> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
