I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that 
limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective:

1.       SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an 
Android feature.

2.       No screen sharing in Webex.

3.       Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via 
SIP-URI.

4.       Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would 
drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.

5.       No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am 
sure.

When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical misses. 
Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the telepresence 
experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I can move the 
video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch between video and 
presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I have become a video 
snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call.

The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less. There is 
no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an airplane.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[chat]<xmpp:[email protected]>[Phone]<tel:+13142121814>[video]<sip:[email protected]>
"Innovation happens on project squared" -- 
http://www.projectsquared.com<http://www.projectsquared.com/>

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>



From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network device?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: "Scott Voll" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Ed Leatherman" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Cisco VOIP" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
We have just purchased 4 of them.  We have large conference rooms in our larger 
sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit.  But in our smaller sites (under 20 
employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small conference room size 
and that typically only one or two people would be in, at a time.

We will see if some of our Regional Managers end up with one as a second 
monitor at there desk.  But that would be, due to the fact that they do a lot 
of video conferencing, and burn up a conference room that multiple people could 
use for meetings.

Only time will tell.

Scott




On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Ed Leatherman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Anyone have these deployed to actually end-users? Thoughts or opinions?

I have a DX80 on loan, after i got over the "This is pretty cool" after 
initially getting it setup, I'm trying to figure out if/where it would be 
useful here (edu) at the steepish price point. We have some disability services 
groups that are using video now, price tag is probably out of their budget 
though.

--
Ed Leatherman

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to