To Lelio, yes these are just like the other desktop IP phones from a network perspective.
Ed, 1. SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an Android feature. Use tel: URIs instead of sip:. I’ve found a couple enhancements on this but nothing committed. 2. No screen sharing in Webex. Roadmapped but I don’t know when it’s planned. I *think* it’s a WebEx feature so could potentially come outside of a phone load with an app update. 3. Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via SIP-URI. This is for a connected HDMI-In device, not the native android desktop. Works on any video call. 4. Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI. Don't recall this one off the top of my head. 5. No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am sure. On the roadmap. -Ryan On Feb 13, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It's the WebEx Android app in general. Anyone know if the iOS WebEx app support screen sharing yet? I don't have an iPhone. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ed Leatherman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Ok so I wasnt crazy when I couldn't get screen sharing working with WebEx :) yes that seems like a critical fail to me On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 11:40 AM Heim, Dennis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective: 1. SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an Android feature. 2. No screen sharing in Webex. 3. Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via SIP-URI. 4. Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI. 5. No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am sure. When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical misses. Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the telepresence experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I can move the video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch between video and presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I have become a video snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call. The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less. There is no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an airplane. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814<tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814> <image001.png><https://twitter.com/CollabSensei> <image002.png><image003.png><tel:+13142121814><image004.png> "Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com<http://www.projectsquared.com/> Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim> From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM To: Scott Voll Cc: Cisco VOIP Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts? Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network device? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 ________________________________ From: "Scott Voll" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "Ed Leatherman" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Cisco VOIP" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts? We have just purchased 4 of them. We have large conference rooms in our larger sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit. But in our smaller sites (under 20 employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small conference room size and that typically only one or two people would be in, at a time. We will see if some of our Regional Managers end up with one as a second monitor at there desk. But that would be, due to the fact that they do a lot of video conferencing, and burn up a conference room that multiple people could use for meetings. Only time will tell. Scott On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Ed Leatherman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Anyone have these deployed to actually end-users? Thoughts or opinions? I have a DX80 on loan, after i got over the "This is pretty cool" after initially getting it setup, I'm trying to figure out if/where it would be useful here (edu) at the steepish price point. We have some disability services groups that are using video now, price tag is probably out of their budget though. -- Ed Leatherman _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
