I think it was supposed to be "that" rather than "than".
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Holloway < [email protected]> wrote: > Dennis, I re-read your reply several times and I cannot make sense of it. > > Are you saying that GoDaddy is the only CA which will work with > Expressway-E and MRA? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:16 AM Heim, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Expressway should be a public certificate. Reports from others than >> goDaddy causes problems. >> >> >> >> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)* >> >> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 >> >> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/CollabSensei> >> >> [image: chat][image: Phone] <+13142121814>[image: video] >> >> "Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com >> >> >> >> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room >> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *[email protected] >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:12 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate? >> >> >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I've already read all Cisco Documentation about Certificate to load on >> the Expressway infrastructure. >> >> >> >> For the Expressway-C I'll use private certificate signed by internal CA. >> >> >> >> >> >> But what about for the Expressway-E? >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> Alessandro >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
