Yes, it's in the Expressway 8.5 release notes. Thanks for confirming. Source: Table 1, Expressway 8.5.1 Release Notes http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/release_note/Cisco-Expressway-Release-Note-X8-5-1.pdf
Oh I'll be too shy to say anything publicly, so no worries. I might come up to you afterwards for an autograph though. ;) On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <[email protected]> wrote: > DX, 88XX, 78XX. This should already be in the VCS docs for 8.5 so > hopefully I’m not getting myself in trouble :) > > Yes, I’m presenting the UCM security session at CLUS this year. My > first time presenting so be nice if you come :) > > -Ryan > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: > > 8800 series I believe are on the short list right now. May even already > have the test firmware released. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Anthony Holloway < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Ryan, >> >> Just to be clear, by Desktop Endpoints you mean DX endpoints, correct? >> >> PS I see you're presenting at CLUS. Can't wait to attend your >> session(s)! >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:01 PM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is somewhat optional today with TC endpoints and Jabber only >>> supporting MRA. It will become mandatory when desktop endpoints start >>> supporting MRA in the very near future. >>> >>> -Ryan >>> >>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think it was supposed to be "that" rather than "than". >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Holloway < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dennis, I re-read your reply several times and I cannot make sense of >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Are you saying that GoDaddy is the only CA which will work with >>>> Expressway-E and MRA? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:16 AM Heim, Dennis < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> Expressway should be a public certificate. Reports from >>>>> others than goDaddy causes problems. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)* >>>>> >>>>> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 >>>>> >>>> <image001.png> <https://twitter.com/CollabSensei> >>>>> >>>>> <image002.png><image003.png> <+13142121814><image004.png> >>>>> >>>> "Innovation happens on project squared" -- >>>>> http://www.projectsquared.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room >>>>> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>* >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *[email protected] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:12 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I've already read all Cisco Documentation about Certificate to load >>>>> on the Expressway infrastructure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For the Expressway-C I'll use private certificate signed by internal >>>>> CA. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But what about for the Expressway-E? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alessandro >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cisco-voip mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-voip mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> >> > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
