medianet is
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND_40/QoSCampus_40.html

Vik's post
http://www.collabcert.com/blog/qos/how-much-bandwidth-does-1-call-consume/


On 15 April 2015 at 13:44, Anthony Holloway <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Can you link us to the sources in question? I personally need a little
> more context to go with your question.
>
> In general, policing a single g711ulaw call is around 93kbps, and rounding
> it to 100kbps still achieves the goal of policing a single call. And yes, a
> class based policer would police media and signaling separately.
>
> Also, I saw something on medianet at last year Cisco Live, but other than
> that, I'm clueless about medianet. I can't say if and how things changed
> once medianet came in to the picture. I'm sure Vik wasn't considering that
> either, based on the fact that he teaches CCIE Collab boot camps, and
> medianet is not a part of the blueprint.
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:22 AM abbas Wali <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> Vik Malhi posted that for a successful g711 call
>>
>> HQSW(config-pmap-c)#police 90500 8000 exc drop ! 0 packet loss
>>
>> now, as per Ciso medianet 4
>>
>> The VoIP and signaling traffic from the VVLAN can be policed to drop at 128 
>> kbps and 32 kbps, respectively (as any excessive traffic matching this 
>> criteria would be indicative of network abuse)
>>
>> Question is 128 kbps supports 1 single voice stream of g711 OR if you go 
>> with Vik, you need to multiply 90500 with the number of calls you need on 
>> that port. I will assume that the sig is classified differently and handled 
>> by diff policer on that port.
>>
>>
>> many thanks
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Abbas Wali*
>>  _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>


-- 
*Abbas Wali*
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to