I wonder what they consider "unexplained post configuration behavior".
This particular line has been set up this way for a number of years without issue so it has something to do with the 10.5 system. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > turns out it is written. > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmsys/accm-712-cm/a03dn.html#wp1100362 > > Shared Line Restrictions > > The following restrictions apply to shared lines: > > <snip> > •Do not configure shared-line appearances on the primary lines of the > phones; for example, if two phones have a shared-line appearance, only one > of the phones should have the primary line configured as shared (the other > phone should have the secondary line configured as shared). > <snip> > > > In version 10 it becomes a suggestion though. Interesting. > > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmsys/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100_chapter_010001.html#CUCM_RF_S05975F9_00 > > > Shared Line Suggestions > Do not configure shared line appearances on primary lines as certain > feature interactions are impacted. Settings of the primary line are > applicable to the shared line. For example: if two phones have a > shared-line appearance, only one phone should have the primary line > configured as shared to avoid unexplained post configuration behavior. > > --- > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. > Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > > 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 > [email protected] > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Erick Wellnitz" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:20:51 PM > *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones > > It is on a fair number of them. They didn't have the issue on 8.6.2 with > the same firmware. > > We're waiting on the next occurrence to gather traces. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> I recall there being an (un)written rule where shared lines should not be >> the primary line. It could cause issues. >> >> Are the shared lines the first DN on the phone? >> >> Lelio >> >> --- >> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >> University of Guelph >> >> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >> [email protected] >> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building >> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Erick Wellnitz" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:00:20 PM >> *Subject: *[cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones >> >> anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM >> 10.5.2 SU1 where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some >> start ringing up to 15 seconds later. Some also experience ringing after >> the call is answered up to 15 seconds after answered. >> >> 88xx phones are the only ones exhibiting this behavior. Another >> consideration is that this shared line is on 17 devices. >> >> Thanks for any insight! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
