Interesting… Out of curiosity, there should first be a CANCEL to the IP phones 
where the call wasn’t answered. The phones should then 200 that CANCEL request, 
and then send the 487 final response to the original INVITE for the call. Do 
you see the 487 final response six seconds after the CANCEL/200 exchange? I ask 
only because this should help you determine where the delay is coming from - 
the phone or CUCM.

- Dan

From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Erick 
Wellnitz
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:51 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

Finally had the behavior repeat.

Found in the console logs and the CM traces that a couple of the phones are, 
for some reason, delaying their 487 - Request Cancelled response for up to 6 
seconds from when the call is answered.

Sent to TAC to see what they have to say.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
turns out it is written.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmsys/accm-712-cm/a03dn.html#wp1100362


Shared Line Restrictions

The following restrictions apply to shared lines:

<snip>
•Do not configure shared-line appearances on the primary lines of the phones; 
for example, if two phones have a shared-line appearance, only one of the 
phones should have the primary line configured as shared (the other phone 
should have the secondary line configured as shared).
<snip>



In version 10 it becomes a suggestion though. Interesting.



http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmsys/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100_chapter_010001.html#CUCM_RF_S05975F9_00

Shared Line Suggestions
Do not configure shared line appearances on primary lines as certain feature 
interactions are impacted. Settings of the primary line are applicable to the 
shared line. For example: if two phones have a shared-line appearance, only one 
phone should have the primary line configured as shared to avoid unexplained 
post configuration behavior.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354<tel:519%E2%80%90824%E2%80%904120%20Ext%2056354>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: "Erick Wellnitz" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:20:51 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

It is on a fair number of them.  They didn't have the issue on 8.6.2 with the 
same firmware.

We're waiting on the next occurrence to gather traces.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I recall there being an (un)written rule where shared lines should not be the 
primary line. It could cause issues.

Are the shared lines the first DN on the phone?

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354<tel:519%E2%80%90824%E2%80%904120%20Ext%2056354>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

________________________________
From: "Erick Wellnitz" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:00:20 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] strange shared line behavior on 88XX phones

anyone seen issues with the 88xx phones on firmware 10.3(1) and CUCM 10.5.2 SU1 
where the line starts ringing on some phones right away and some start ringing 
up to 15 seconds later.  Some also experience ringing after the call is 
answered up to 15 seconds after answered.

88xx phones are the only ones exhibiting this behavior.  Another consideration 
is that this shared line is on 17 devices.

Thanks for any insight!

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to