I don't think it would be that big of a deal for a customer to open up a few tcp ports for a temporary tls connection .... but maybe not for every customer/situation. Could piggy back on 8443 cause a lot of Cisco UC customers might already have that open.
IMO, I think there are plenty of scenarios is where it would work. Pie in the sky for now though :) Thanks, Ryan On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:06 PM, Horton, Jamin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Don't ever see that happening. Can you imagine the firewall issues you would have in trying to get a web based tool initiating a connection to what are usually internal only accessible applications! Good wish list though. Jamin Horton - Collaboration Practice Manager CCIE Collaboration #39988 Direct: 303-734-4048 Cell: 720-401-8340 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <image001.png> <image002.jpg> <image004.png><xmpp:[email protected]><image006.png><tel:3037344048><image008.png><tel:[email protected]><image010.png><https://jabber-guest.uc.oneneck.com/call/[email protected]><image012.png><https://oneneck.webex.com/join/jamin.horton><image014.png><tel:3033873980> <image015.png> - This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:03 PM To: Thomas LeMay Cc: cisco voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] as built doc generation - should be a web app, no desktop gui - if I have to use a desktop GUI, please let me maximize the window - I need an API, everything is better with an API (even toasters) - I want a cloud based export; an arguable point I know, because I could manually move the local export to a cloud - I want a regex engine that allows me to tone down the captured data based on pattern matching Thanks, Ryan On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:53 PM, Thomas LeMay <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, Ryan, I like Uplinx. What are some of the shortfalls? Tom From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:52 PM To: cisco voip Subject: [cisco-voip] as built doc generation What is everyone using to build as built docs nowadays? Variphy doesn't quite get everything I want to see and Uplinx is nice but has some shortfalls IMO that never seem to get addressed. Anyone have other suggestions besides Variphy and Uplinx? I'd love to whitebox something but do not have the time. Thanks, = Ryan = Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Spark: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Twitter: @ryanthomashuff<http://twitter.com/ryanthomashuff> LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff<http://linkedin.com/in/ryanthomashuff> Web ryanthomashuff.com<http://ryanthomashuff.com>
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
