have you used DNA to confirm it's not matching something else? Scott
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Gary Parker <g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk> wrote: > Morning all, I came across a significant block of numbers in the UK that > can’t be called by our cucm (11.5.1(SU2) with the 3.1.34-GB dialplan) due > to them not being recognised as valid NATIONAL calls. > > Milton Keynes numbers (01908) hit the following rule: > > Pattern: 0+1[2-9][02-9]X+[2-9]XXXXX > > Failing number: 0 1 9 0 8 0 67000 > ^ this is where the match fails, it’s not > a digit between 2-9 > > I’ve added a route pattern to allow the numbers to be called but I > wondered if this was something that was worth/qualifed for being raised as > a defect with TAC? > > > --- > /-Gary Parker----------------------------------f--\ > | Unified Communications Service Manager | > n Loughborough University, IT Services | > | tel:+441509635635 sip:g...@lboro.ac.uk o > | http://delphium.lboro.ac.uk/pubkey.txt | > \r----------------------------------------------d-/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip