have you used DNA to confirm it's not matching something else?

Scott


On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Gary Parker <g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:

> Morning all, I came across a significant block of numbers in the UK that
> can’t be called by our cucm (11.5.1(SU2) with the 3.1.34-GB dialplan) due
> to them not being recognised as valid NATIONAL calls.
>
> Milton Keynes numbers (01908) hit the following rule:
>
> Pattern:        0+1[2-9][02-9]X+[2-9]XXXXX
>
> Failing number: 0 1 9    0    8  0   67000
>                                  ^ this is where the match fails, it’s not
> a digit between 2-9
>
> I’ve added a route pattern to allow the numbers to be called but I
> wondered if this was something that was worth/qualifed for being raised as
> a defect with TAC?
>
>
> ---
> /-Gary Parker----------------------------------f--\
> |     Unified Communications Service Manager      |
> n      Loughborough University, IT Services       |
> |     tel:+441509635635 sip:g...@lboro.ac.uk      o
> |     http://delphium.lboro.ac.uk/pubkey.txt      |
> \r----------------------------------------------d-/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to