Somewhere a DC sales person is drooling and doesn’t know why… -Ryan
On Apr 13, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Anthony Holloway <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Oooo! I like the sound of that! With full mesh SIP trunks between all of the clusters too. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:57 AM daniele visaggio <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Ops, I misread. Sorry You bought two starter kits, so 70 CUWL in total. The answer to both your questions then is yes. Each cucm asks to the plm all the needed licenses, as per your configuration. As long as the total users among the two clusters with less than 10 devices is <= 70, you are fine. In theory you could have 70 clusters with one user each 😀 Regards 2018-04-13 14:15 GMT+02:00 Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: The starter pack is a marketing thing, on the backend it’s just regular licenses and can be pooled. It will just show as 70 licenses as you mentioned and can be shared. Matthew Loraditch Sr. Network Engineer p: 443.541.1518<tel:443.541.1518> w: www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <image880138.png> <image878998.png><https://facebook.com/heliontech> <image128958.png><https://twitter.com/heliontech> <image336063.png><https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> From: cisco-voip <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Ki Wi Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 4:02 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [cisco-voip] BE6K Starter Pack behavior/limitation Hi Group, If I purchased 2 x BE6k starter packs of 35 CUWL Standard license for installation with 2 different clusters. There are located in 2 different part of the world, there's latency issues so we have to do this although number of users are low. How will it show up in PLM? 70 CUWL STD license? Can it be shared among the 2 clusters? Let's say 1 cluster will be using 45 CUWL standard licenses while another one use like 25 CUWL ? Will this lead to any license violation in the PLM? -- Regards, Ki Wi _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
