I still like how the T1 PRIs on the 6608s could register to different clusters without a fuss.
And if their was a fuss, you asked Dick Tracy to help. -sent from mobile device- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1<x-apple-data-detectors://1/0> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354<tel:519-824-4120;56354> | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] On Apr 3, 2019, at 11:07 PM, Anthony Holloway <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Apparently I have been living under a rock for 13 years. I didn't know the VG248 wasn't IOS based, because, well, I've never worked with one. So, what is it then? On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:03 PM NateCCIE <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: VG248 was the best one ever made by Cisco. Not IOS based made the thing super stable and easy to configure/manage. Makes me sad when ever I think about it. -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:35 PM To: voyp list, cisco-voip ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules I see the VG350 has pretty much been EOL'd (February 29, 2024) in favour of ISR4K with high density voice service modules or a VG450 (which is ISR4K based). https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg- series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html<https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html> Anybody know if the VG310 and VG320 is going that path? It would be hard to assume so, since the VG400s are very low density and look like they're replacing the VG202/VG204. I can't imagine having to fork out for a ISR4K for 24 or 48 analog ports. Thoughts? --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs><http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
