Interestingly enough, if you read the title, it says "Selected" - it seems you 
can still get the VG350-72F48E/K9 bundle in configuration tool and it doesn't 
get tagged with the orange AEOS tag. *shrug* but for how long?

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

From: Johnson, Tim <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:31 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>; voyp list, cisco-voip 
([email protected]) <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules

Wow, thanks for the heads up on this. We just got a 350 a few months ago and 
were planning to get a couple more as we migrate off our legacy pbx.

We're about to submit an order for a 320 also, so it would definitely be nice 
to know if that EOL announcement is coming soon!

Tim Johnson
Voice & Video Engineer
Central Michigan University
+19897744406
sip:[email protected]
[webexemailsig]<https://cmich.webex.com/meet/johns10t>


From: cisco-voip 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 2:35 PM
To: voyp list, cisco-voip 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg310/320 or ISR4K with analog modules


I see the VG350 has pretty much been EOL'd (February 29, 2024) in favour of 
ISR4K with high density voice service modules or a VG450 (which is ISR4K based).

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/vg-series-gateways/eos-eol-notice-c51-741597.html

Anybody know if the VG310 and VG320 is going that path? It would be hard to 
assume so, since the VG400s are very low density and look like they're 
replacing the VG202/VG204.

I can't imagine having to fork out for a ISR4K for 24 or 48 analog ports.

Thoughts?


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to