That PLAR idea is fun :) 2 audio files at once is not ideal...
I haven't tested this yet, but this is where I'm going. Looking at possibly turning this into a container to post audio files to and get back a muxed Left / Right "stereo" conversation. https://securitronlinux.com/debian-testing/merge-left-and-right-audio-tracks-into-a-stereo-file-with-sox-on-linux/ Now I just need to figure out how long a recorded call can be... I guess I hadn't thought of that part as either a requirement or request... On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, at 9:52 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > I wonder if a PLAR on a DN that is listed as an alternate extension would > help. > > So, > > Tap PLAR > Then merge calls > > You could even move the merge Soft key earlier? > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 11, 2021, at 9:53 PM, Kent Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and >> know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to >> [email protected] >> >> >> My guess is it won’t get fixed as it would help us all out! LOL. >> >> >>> On Jan 11, 2021, at 2:18 PM, NateCCIE <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> There is a record softkey that does what you’re asking Leilo. The problem >>> with Unity Live record is the CUCM BIB calls the number twice, one for TX >>> and one for RX, and you get two-one sided voicemails in the inbox. If that >>> gets fixed, it’s an amazing option. >>> >>> *From:* cisco-voip <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of >>> *Lelio Fulgenzi >>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2021 2:00 PM >>> *To:* Nick Barnett <[email protected]>; Brian Meade <[email protected]> >>> *Cc:* cisco-voip <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Alternatives for MediaSense simple recording? >>> >>> It’s too bad that CUCM doesn’t have a LiveRecord softkey macro that does >>> the conferencing and dialing of the live record extension. >>> >>> To ask people to press conference and then dial live record and the >>> conference again, is just way to much to ask. I think. >>> >>> Has Live Record support from CUCM side improved at all? >>> >>> >>> *From:* Nick Barnett <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2021 3:50 PM >>> *To:* Brian Meade <[email protected]>; Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> >>> *Cc:* cisco-voip <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Alternatives for MediaSense simple recording? >>> >>> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and >>> know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> Unity live record, that's one I haven't thought of yet. Thanks! >>> >>> I'm pretty sure, mediasense is totally dead. We just upgraded to CUCM 12.5 >>> SU3 in October. MediaSense 11.5 su2 said it was compatible with CUCM 12.x, >>> but in this case, it only meant 12.x THRU 12.5 SU2. The BU's solution was >>> to downgrade to SU2. We kind of pushed them and they came back with a fix. >>> Apparently between CUCM 12.5 SU2 and 12.5 SU3, CUCM forced HTTPs for AXL >>> connections. to fix it, TAC had to root into my nodes and make a change to >>> the haproxy.conf file to stop forcing HTTPS. >>> >>> This whole mess took me right up to the last day of support and I think >>> everyone at cisco hated me, but they were clear there would be no more >>> support for this monster. meh >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Brian Meade wrote: >>>> Unity Connection Live Record may be an option you could try and have it >>>> conference in that number. >>>> >>>> I think MediaSense is still around for video call handlers/video >>>> voicemail/video on hold if I remember correctly. I think they only killed >>>> it for recording calls. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:56 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I sure was sad when they EOL’ed Media Sense. I really wanted to do video >>>>> call handlers and video voicemail and greetings. >>>>> >>>>> Take a look at https://www.mns.vc/ they might have what you’re looking >>>>> for. >>>>> >>>>> Lelio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cisco-voip <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of >>>>> *Nick Barnett >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2021 12:54 PM >>>>> *To:* cisco-voip <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Alternatives for MediaSense simple recording? >>>>> >>>>> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the University of >>>>> Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the >>>>> sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious >>>>> emails to [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Hey folks. What are people using now that MediaSense is EOL? It was fine >>>>> for what it was. It just recorded anything you threw into it. it weaseled >>>>> it's way into some weird apps we have, and now I'm kinda stuck. We have >>>>> an iphone app that was developed to work in areas with poor data >>>>> connectivity. It creates a conference call to a PSTN number that routes >>>>> into our system and is a route pattern attached to a SIP trunk directly >>>>> to MediaSense. >>>>> >>>>> From there, we use APIs to pull the file down and save it using meta data >>>>> from the initial call. >>>>> >>>>> We aren't using ANY of the recording profiles or advanced features of >>>>> mediasense. Our new recording system is NICE Engage and they don't offer >>>>> any way to record via route patterns. >>>>> >>>>> Are there any open source, or really ANYTHING else out there that can do >>>>> this simple procedure? The most basic of requirements are 1) non >>>>> proprietary audio format 2) retrievable with an API or script. My cisco >>>>> account team can only recommend Webex for recording which doesn't look to >>>>> allow recording with a route pattern. Our VAR sells NICE which requires >>>>> an extra application to kick of a recording like this. >>>>> >>>>> What are you guys using? Any suggestions for me? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> P.S. just to be clear, MeidaSense is not our quality assurance platform. >>>>> We use NICE Engage for that and it's fine for now... just looking for >>>>> something to fill the gap left by a disappearing MediaSense and our route >>>>> pattern recording method. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cisco-voip mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip Thanks, Nick
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
