why does the following result from the 'sh ip route rip' command when rip is classful? R 172.16.55.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14, Serial0 R 172.16.50.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14, Serial0 R 172.16.30.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14, Serial0 R 172.16.40.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14, Serial0 however, if you just use the 'sh ip route' command, the subnet mask does not appear. thanks makeeda ___________________________________ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Becky
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... JCoyne
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Tim Evens
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Jay Hennigan
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Becky
- Re: Sh ip route rip command m. jean stockton
- Re: Sh ip route rip command Kevin Wigle
- Re: Sh ip route rip command Earl Aboytes
- RE: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Daniel Cotts
- RE: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Juan Blanco
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... NeoLink2000
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... John Neiberger
- RE: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Taylor, Don
- RE: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Kevin Cappis
- Re: New CCNA - realizing what I don't know..... Matt C. Lange

