Thanks a lot Daniel. That was exactly the type of solution I was looking for.
Robert ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Try > passive-interface default > no passive-interface s0 (or whatever) > Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071] > > > > > > I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP > > as my routing > > protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity > > to another > > organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the > > solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive > > interfaces so > > that RIP updates are not sent out interfaces that do not have any RIP > > routers. I also have 3 VLANs where I only need a static > > route, so I have > > added those as passive interfaces for EIGRP too. My question > > is: is this > > the most efficient way to do it? > > I imagine that in a very large network, adding every single > > interface as a > > passive interface would get old rather quickly. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66207&t=66071 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
