If you really want to make big money, go for MPLampS:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bala-mplamps-04.txt

Very specialized, but big market,
:-)
Eric

----- Original Message -----
From: "nrf" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: A career in MPLS..... [7:66609]


> ""Cisco Nuts""  wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Thank you so much for your enlightening reply!!
> >
> > And thank God I moved away from Novell to MS to Citrix and finally Cisco
> > and now onto MPLS.......And thank God "it is a very specialized and
small
> > market right now that is looking for MPLS experience"....All the more
> > better to develop skills in MPLS as every Tom, Dick and Harry is either
> > just  routing or switching   ;- )
> >
> > Looks like MPLS is the way to go!!! Come'on Sprint.....Let's get on with
> > the Show :-)
>
> Well, actually, I would temper my enthusiasm.  Like you said, MPLS is
indeed
> a very small and specialized market, meaning there really aren't many jobs
> because there are so few implementations.  True, you might reply that
there
> are also few people who know MPLS.  But almost all those MPLS are within
the
> large carriers where if you want to be the MPLS engineer, you can't just
> know MPLS, you have to REALLY REALLY REALLY know it, with verifiable
> experience and/or published papers to boot.  Carriers aren't going to snap
> you up just because you may have read a book or took a 1-week class.  .
>
> >
> > >From: """" >Reply-To: """" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: A
> > career in MPLS..... [7:66609] >Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:47:44 GMT >
>Ah -
> > MPLS. Yes there are several large carriers with MPLS >deployed or in the
> > process of deploying it (equant, global >crossing...). Some on their
core
> > and some on their layer 2 networks >such as ATM (AT&T for example).
> > Others backed away from it but >are now looking at it since it's a huge
> > marketing beast that can't be >ignored (Sprint for example). > >Aside
> > from ISP's some large enterprises are using it for things like >MPLS
> > enabled VPN's. As to the market for someone that knows >MPLS - what I
> > have seen is it's a very specialized and small market >right now that is
> > looking for MPLS experience. Mostly due to it still >being relatively
new
> > in deployments and being relatively small in the >number of deployments.
> > > >I do believe however after saying that - that it never hurts to have
a
> > >wide background of skills. Imagine if you specialized in Novell and
> > >never moved into other areas for example. Novell is a great product
>but
> > the market for Novell pro's dried up a lot from the good ole days. >You
> > would be much less marketable if you didn't also know other >things such
> > as Microsoft or Routing or ....... > >I could go into my opinions of the
> > pros and cons of MPLS and where >I think it fits - but that's another
> > boring story for later :) > > >www.ccie4u.com > > > >On 1 Apr 2003 at
> > 15:47, nrf wrote: > > > ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message > >
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hello group,
How
> > does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLS > > > as part
of
> > your core job day in and out.....Is it worth it? Since our > > > network
> > does not use MPLS (maybe never will) inspite of being one of the > > >
> > Big Four Tier 1 SP's.... > > > > Let me guess. Do you work for Sprint? >
> > > > > >are there other SP's that use MPLS in their > > > backbone?? > >
>
> > > Yeah, there are some. > > > > >I have just given myself a month or so
> > break from my CCIE Lab > > > Prep.(yeah!yeah! most would consider me
> > stupid on this) to study MPLS > > > for the CCIP and am thinking if I
> > should pursue this subject just like I > > > did for BGP.....know it
> > inside out cold.....and maybe consider a new > > > career/job in MPLS
> > (obviously along with BGP, MBGP, MCast etc...) Does > > > anyone know of
> > how MPLS is viewed out there? I mean, in terms of > > > implementation,
> > popularity and last but not the least , $$$ ??? >;->Which > > > of the
> > Big SP's or Enterprise networks have implemented MPLS? Has it been > > >
> > worth the advantages that MPLS proposes??Thank you.Sincerely,CN > > > >
> > The way I see it is this. MPLS is potentially powerful technology for it
> > > > can be used as a lingua-franca among a carrier's network and
> > transport >layer > > and also as a way to impose circuit-switching
> > discipline upon IP and > > therefore offer circuit-switching services
> > with a pure IP network. > > > > But MPLS is by no means a slam-dunk.
> > Certain carriers, most notably > > Sprint, have elected not to go down
> > the MPLS path because they believe the > > technology is immature (and
> > they are correct) and also because they believe > > that they can garner
> > the benefits of MPLS by other means (also correct). > > The point is
that
> > while MPLS offers great potential, it also presents > > problems, so
> > implementing it is not a no-brainer. > > > > And furthermore, I don't
> > particularly like the way that Cisco is pushing > > MPLS, particularly
in
> > its cert program. In my opinion, I think Cisco's >cert > > programs
> > emphasize the least useful parts of MPLS while neglecting the more > >
> > useful parts. For example, I don't understand why Cisco pushes LDP the
> > way > > it does, for LDP merely builds LSP's that correspond to the
route
> > table, >but > > what's so useful about having LDP's that look like the
> > route table? It is > > far more useful to build LSP's that differ from
> > the route table, but the > > methods of doing that are not really
covered
> > very much (if at all) in the > > Cisco curricula. Also, I don't
> > understand why Cisco places such an >emphasis > > on L3VPN's, as if
> > L3VPNs were the only important service that MPLS enables. > > L3VPN's
are
> > only one of the new services that you can enable, and in my > > opinion,
> > one of the less important ones. Far more important are the L2VPN > >
> > capabilities and the ability to unify IP, ATM, and optical into a single
> > > > management plane. The point I'm making is that if you merely study
> > MPLS > > according to the Cisco curricula, you really haven't learned
> > much about it > > that's actually useful. > > > > > > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>
> > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66792&t=66609
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to