Hi, Are you sure pbi_vgw_003 can reach your ntp servers? Are you sure? As you can see from the show ntp pbi_vgw_001 is sync.ed to the ntp server. Also keep in mind that the sync. can take a while. I once configured NTP on an Alcatel Omniswitch-Router and the sync. took 5 min.
Regards, Jans Pichit Ruangroj wrote: >Hi, > I've got a prob with ntp. The ntp is configured but the command "ntp >clock-period ........." didn't appear when doing "show running" command. >I've tried reload, disable/enable the ntp but never work. I saw the offset >value is very high compare with the normal one. What is the cause to make it >high like this? Please help. > >pbi_vgw_003#sh run | be ntp >ntp update-calendar >ntp server 203.113.94.20 >ntp server 203.113.94.19 > >pbi_vgw_003#sh ntp as > > address ref clock st when poll reach delay >offset disp > ~203.113.94.20 203.113.94.1 2 57 64 0 1.1 2699.9 >16000. > ~203.113.94.19 203.113.94.1 2 42 64 0 1.0 833.67 >16000. > * master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, - candidate, >~configured > >The another device is on the same subnet & never get a problem > > >pbi_vgw_001#sh run | be ntp >ntp clock-period 17179504 >ntp update-calendar >ntp server 203.113.94.20 >ntp server 203.113.94.19 > >pbi_vgw_001#sh ntp as > > address ref clock st when poll reach delay >offset disp >*~203.113.94.20 203.113.94.1 2 281 1024 377 1.1 1.28 >0.3 >+~203.113.94.19 203.113.94.1 2 259 1024 377 1.1 6.81 >0.4 > * master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, - candidate, >~configured Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71888&t=71887 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
