ip default-gateway in IOS is only used when the device is acting as a host (not routing, etc).
If it has IP routing enabled, then you probably want to use a default route (0.0.0.0/0) and/or other routes for your networks (static, RIP, EIGRP, etc). Erick --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > I'm not saying that your way won't work. To tell > you the truth, I don't > really understand your method. I've just been > through a lot of migrations > myself in the past with customers, and creating new > VLANs and moving users > over to them is the typical way it is accomplished. > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete > it from your computer. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: gab.seun jones.ewulomi > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: switch default gateway question > [7:72288] > > > Hi Fred, > > Yes we are using vlans. Hence why we purchased the > types of switches > > What I listed was a suggestion in which I asked if > that way to would work. > > I know you can create another vlan sub-interface and > start moving the the > new addresses. > > I was thinking of the idea that if the switches can > accept more than 2 > default routes then why wont that way work > > What is wrong with dual default routes? > > As i understand according to how these works there > will be a primary default > > etc > > regards, > seun > > > >From: "Reimer, Fred" > >To: "gab S.E jones" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: switch default gateway question > [7:72288] > >Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:11:24 -0400 > > > >Say what? > > > >Why don't you just create additional VLANs for the > new address space(s) and > >move PC's to the new VLANs as their addresses are > changed? There is no > >need > >to be messing around with dual default routes. You > could move all of the > >switches over to the new address space immediately, > or change them over > >time > >to the new address and VLAN. > > > >If you are not using VLANs, then why did you > purchase 4506s, 3550s, and > >6509s? > > > >Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > > > >Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, > Atlanta, GA 30338 > >Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: > 888-260-2050 > > > > > >NOTICE; This email contains confidential or > proprietary information which > >may be legally privileged. It is intended only for > the named recipient(s). > >If an addressing or transmission error has > misdirected the email, please > >notify the author by replying to this message. If > you are not the named > >recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, > distribute, copy, print > >or rely on this email, and should immediately > delete it from your computer. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: gab S.E jones > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:48 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: switch default gateway question [7:72288] > > > >Basically I want to know how best to approach the > situation. Our network is > >all statically mapped no dynamic routing > > > >our switches(4506,3550,6509) are going to be > changed to a different address > >range. the switches can accept more than one > default gateway. > >The core routers addresses has to be changed to the > same subnet as the > >switches soon > > > >1)the switch old ip address is on a 11/8 address > pointing to the core > >router(interface) with a 11/8 address > >2)now the switch addresses are being changed to a > 10/16(subnetted) address > >and the default gateway has to point to the core > with a 10/16 address as > >well > > > >Myu approach was to > > > >1)configure the swith with another default pointing > to a 10/16 > >2)configure a secondary interface on the core with > a 10/16 address > >3)the other core routers connected to this core > will be also given a > >secondary of 10/16 address > >4)then on the core routers put floating statics for > all our original routes > >to point to the default GW 10/16 addresses > > > >I presume that because the swithes now have to > defalt GW statements that > >the > >swith will automatically send packest for pc's of > 10 and 11 addresses. > >While > >we slowly migrate all our lan devices to the new > 10/16 GW > > > >5)will start gradually changing the lan devices to > start pointing to the > >10/16 GW > > > >Please correct me if im thinking of this the wrong > way. > > > >Any advice will be greatly appreciated > > > >My apologies if I didnt explain myself properly > > > >regards, > >seun > _________________________________________________________________ > Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! > http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72453&t=72288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
