No reason to apologize so much! It was just a little confusing. The scary part is:
"I was told to just re-address the routers for this customer without any prior good knowledge of how the Lan team have gone about their design." Now that's scary! Our engineers would be fired on the spot if they proposed some LAN design without taking into account the layer-3 migration plan... Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -----Original Message----- From: gab S.E jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: switch default gateway question [7:72288] Hi people, My sincere, sincere apologies that i didnt explain the situation more clearly. I deserve to get attacked. Have only started working on this customers network for a few days now Yes it is a flat network (thanks Fred). Have just started to review this customers network and still dont know all the details to fully yet(the customers dont either believe it or not) What I listed was a suggestion in which I asked if that way too would work which i have noticed is not a good idea even if it might work. My apologies Zsombor i mis quoted my self what I meant to say was you can use statics to load balance as well. e.g will load balance Ip route 100.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.1 Ip route 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.2 e.g will as a backup ip route 100.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.1 ip route 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.2 5 Fred that was the original plan I had in mind as well thanks. I was going to be moving the PC's that are all in one VLAN to a bunch of separate VLANs. I just implied on the poissibilty of using another default route to point to as another way of moving the pc's across as I have never done it that way before. hi Priscilla thanks for your input. I do know how you feel I find it frustrating as well when I dont understand questions. My apologies on mis-guidiance in my explaination as I just rushed it. I was told to just re-address the routers for this customer without any prior good knowledge of how the Lan team have gone about their design >Was the network all one big flat network with everything being addressed with 11.0.0.0/8 before? And the switches >really were just L2 switches? And now they are moving to subnets and using the switches as routers? this is correct Priscilla I thank everyone for thier input even if I didnt make myself clear regards, seun Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72481&t=72288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
