Not that this will solve your problem, but why do you need IGMP between two routers?
Thanks, Zsombor At 08:22 AM 7/17/2003 +0000, MR wrote: >At the source end , if i observed traffic on tunnel, it was 1.5mb . But at >the >other end , it was zero.There was no incoming traffic. As i said earlier , >its not a point to point connection ans involves multiple transit routers on >the way. > >R1 --- SP1 -------SP2---R2 > TS------------------------TD > >SP-Service Provider >TS- Tunnel Source >TD-Tunnel Dest. > >At SP1 , we observed there was traffic on their serial interface with R1. Now >multicast is not enabled in any SP router. Its enabled only in R1 & R2. >Should >we be enabling it. As it was a public n/w we couldnt. > >Also there was no RP configured in R1 & R2. Just enabled multicast with IGMP >group specified. We enabled PIM /IGMP in both tunnel as well as serial >interfaces of R1&R2. > >R1 Config- >ip multicast-routing >interface Tunnel0 > ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.252 > ip pim dense-mode > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1 > tunnel source a.b.c.d > tunnel destination w.x.y.z > >interface Serial0 > ip address a.b.c.d 255.255.255.252 > ip pim dense-mode > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1. > >R2 Config- >ip multicast-routing >interface Tunnel0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252 > ip pim dense-mode > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1 > tunnel source w.x.y.z > tunnel destination a.b.c.d > >interface Serial0 > ip address w.x.y.z 255.255.255.252 > ip pim dense-mode > ip igmp join-group 224.1.1.1. > > >Please do revert back to me for more info. > >Rgds > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Reimer, Fred > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:59 AM > Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403] > > > I think you said that you see traffic going out one tunnel, but not coming > in on the other end of the tunnel. How are you checking that? What does > your mroute cache look like for the group in question? Does it list the > tunnel interface as an outgoing interface? On the end that isn't receiving > anything, is it configured for the RP? Does it find the RP successfully? > Does it know about the group in it's mroute cache? > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403] > > I have configured it same time ago; the serial link was frame relay. But I > used point-to-point subinterface > > Something like that: > > R1 > > interface tunnel 0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252 > ip pim sparse-dense-mode > tunnel source 192.168.1.1 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.2 > ! > inter ser 0 > encap frame-relay > ! > inter ser 0.1 point > ip ad 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 > frame-relay map interface-dlci 100 > > > Same for R2. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72476&t=72403 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
