I wouldn't call it load-balancing so much as it's load-sharing. On routers
where you have multiple interfaces for VLANs configured, you can make one
router the primary for certain interfaces/VLANs and the second router the
primary for the rest.

Here's a sample config showing what I mean.

Router01
=======================
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 speed 100
 full-duplex

interface FastEthernet0/0.1
 description default VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 1
 ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.2
 description Restricted VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 101
 ip address 10.101.0.2 255.255.0.0
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.101.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.3
 description Labs VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 102
 ip address 10.102.0.2 255.255.0.0
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.102.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.4
 description Corporate VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 103
 ip address 10.103.0.2 255.255.0.0
 standby 2 priority 100
 standby 2 preempt
 standby 2 ip 10.103.0.1
 standby 2 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast

Router02
==================
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 speed 100
 full-duplex

interface FastEthernet0/0.1
 description default VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 1
 ip address 10.10.0.3 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 priority 100
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.2
 description Restricted VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 101
 ip address 10.101.0.3 255.255.0.0
 standby 1 priority 100
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.101.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.3
 description Labs VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 102
 ip address 10.102.0.3 255.255.0.0
 standby 1 priority 100
 standby 1 preempt
 standby 1 ip 10.102.0.1
 standby 1 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.4
 description Corporate VLAN
 encapsulation dot1Q 103
 ip address 10.103.0.3 255.255.0.0
 standby 2 priority 110
 standby 2 preempt
 standby 2 ip 10.103.0.1
 standby 2 track FastEthernet 0/0 15
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.1
 ip helper-address 10.103.1.2
 no ip directed-broadcast


Hope this helps.

Karen E Young
Network Engineer
ELF Technologies, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




                                                                                       
                             
                    NeoLink2000@a                                                      
                             
                    ol.com               To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         
                             
                    Sent by:             cc:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                  
                             
                    nobody@groups        Subject:     Re: Network Design Question      
                             
                    tudy.com                                                           
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                    08/08/00                                                           
                             
                    08:03 AM                                                           
                             
                    Please                                                             
                             
                    respond to                                                         
                             
                    NeoLink2000                                                        
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             



In a message dated 8/8/00 10:48:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:


<< > I believe that I can use HSRP on the LAN side of HQ, but that is
>not possible on the WAN. I cannot use EIGRP because it is Cisco
>proprietary.
 >>

Isn't HSRP used more for fault tolerance than it is for load balancing?
Actually, I've never even heard of the two (HSRP and Load balancing) going
together. At least that's what I got from reading up on it. Please let me
know where I am confused.

Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA, CCDA
<A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

    If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a
Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and
explode once a year killing everyone inside.
                                        ~Robert Cringely, InfoWorld~

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to