On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Hartnell, George wrote:
> I'm having some difficulty getting bridge-group routing to happen. Static
> routing happens just ducky between two IP addressed interfaces. IRB is
> enabled. Bridge group 64 (my number of the month) remains painfully silent
> as the packets bounce back and forth, back and forth, between a routed port
> and the default gateway downstream. The (sparse) manual has been followed,
> but the BVI class C virtual interface will neither route nor respond.
>
> The example scripts at Cisco were quite instructive. They do not, however,
> assign routed interfaces a direct IP address, instead relying on this BVI
> scheme. The very one I can't get to work.
>
> Anyone out there with similar equipment, having time, might drop a piece of
> wisdom this way.
Can you post a part of your config? IRB is pretty simple stuff. You said
you have irb enabled. Then you have created the BVI's. Inside the Routed
interfaces you have declared a bridge group? And then defined the bridge
group on the router? What type of traffic are you trying to bridge? Can
you ping the BVI from the client?
Brian
>
> Best, G.
>
> "Be strict in what you send, and forgiving in what you receive."
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> George Hartnell, Network Supervisor
> Bellingham School District, 1306 DuPont St.
> Bellingham, Wa. 98225-3198 (360)647-6860
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Mail
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
