are you using any snmp applications that monitor this backup link???
if so, you will need to use an access-list or place the isdn interface in
standy-mode by [backup interface bri1/0] [backup delay]to prevent the snmp
activity from polling your backup interface....$$$$$....lawrence
>From: "Hans Schimek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Hans Schimek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Backup Interface and Routing!
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:32:16 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [208.32.175.78] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBBD313A400B2D820F3B6D020AF4E0B3024; Wed Nov 08 13:44:50 2000
>Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
>with SMTP id QAA16000;Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:41:55 -0500
>Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:33
>-0500
>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>QAA14075GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:32 -0500
>Received: from email01.aon.at (WARSL401PIP1.highway.telekom.at
>[195.3.96.69])by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
>QAA14048GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:35:29 -0500
>Received: (qmail 374726 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2000 21:31:15 -0000
>Received: from n229p018.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO homer)
>([213.33.28.146]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by
>qmail1.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 8 Nov 2000 21:31:15 -0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 08 13:46:11 2000
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
>Importance: Normal
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by groupstudy.com id
>QAA16000
>
>Hi!
>
>i configured a serial link and an ISDN link between two routers.
>the serial line is the primary line. if it fails the backup line
> ISDN-Interface)
>takes over.
>i configured RIP -
>To prevent Routing Updates from establishing the call
>i set the ISDN-Interface as PASSIVE.
>Updates didn`t initate the call anymore.
>BUT !
>what about the routing information. if the primary fails, no routing
>updates
>won`t flow. so i configured static routes with a higher administrative
>distance
>-
>
>IS THERE ANOTHER SOLUTION FOR THAT PROBLEM !
>
>
>thanx in advance
>
>
>
>
>=============================
>Hans Schimek
>
>Student
>Fachhochschule St. P�lten f.
>Telekommunikation und Medien
>
>mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> gsm : +43 699 10605315
> fax : +43 3613 2311 4
> icq : 22308773
> www : www.schimek.net
>
>=============================
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
