Then you have a point to point connection and should use /30's for the
interfaces. If you want to provide more specifics then I could probably do
the same.
andy
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Fowler, Joey wrote:
> What if the link between each router wasn't Ethernet but was a T1.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Walden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:39 PM
> To: Fowler, Joey
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Routing Scenario...
>
>
>
>
> I can't think of any reason to put the ethernet interfaces in different
> subnets.
>
> andy
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Fowler, Joey wrote:
>
> > Let's say Router A and D both have a subnet that in scenario 1 was shared.
> > After changing it, to the second scenario, would the subnet need to be
> > divided into two? i.e. originally 12.12.12.0/24 before and 12.12.12.0/25 &
> > 12.12.12.128/25 afterward?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Walden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 9:41 AM
> > To: Fowler, Joey
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Routing Scenario...
> >
> >
> >
> > Are the connections to two different providers? Assuming they are and you
> > are recieving two different sets of routes, you could run an IBGP session
> > between the two routers so they could share routes for outgoing
> > traffic. As far as incoming, you will need to study the traffic patterns
> > to the two different providers then tweak it with aspath prepends and
> > route filtering.
> >
> > andy
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Fowler, Joey wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Let's say we have the following:
> > >
> > > Internet---A---|
> > > |<- Ethernet Same subnet - two paths from the
> Internet
> > > Internet--D----|
> > >
> > > And a person wanted to change it to the following:
> > >
> > > Internet---A---B
> > > |
> > > Internet---D---C
> > >
> > > The links between each router above is a T1.
> > > A and D both have an Ethernet connection coming off of them.
> > >
> > > Here is my question. On the first graph with A and D connected you can
> run
> > > BGP so that any traffic is shared on each router. Is there now a way to
> > keep
> > > that between A and D so that they both receive any info destined for
> that
> > > subnet? I don't see any way there could be, but I also am still learning
> > > about BGP. If this isn't possible would it make sense to subnet the
> > > available network address that A and D currently share and route traffic
> > > between the two of them?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Joey Fowler
> > >
> > > We are told that talent creates its own opportunities. But it sometimes
> > > seems that intense desire creates not only its own opportunities, but
> its
> > > own talents.
> > > - Eric Hoffer (1902-1983 American Author & Philosopher)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
