Cisco told me that they have third party partners who have access servers
similar to TACACS+, but which use the NT user database. I have yet to
squeeze the name of any of these partners out of them, but they are rumored
to exist anyway. I hope it's true. It would be nice to only have to deal
with one user database.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
""Jason"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96ikbs$uka$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96ikbs$uka$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The PIX can use internally stored pre-shared keys, or can use external
> authentication such as TACACS+.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/700/configsec.html
>
> --
> Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
> List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
> Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
>
>
> "Deepak Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > quick question, and probably dumb question!!.....
> >
> > when I set up a pix firewall
> >
> >
> > user------56k dialup------>pix------nt server----
> >
> > to authenticate the user, does pix use NT auth. or another type of
> > auth.username/password has to be setup within pix...
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > _________________________________
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
