At 04:24 PM 4/14/01 -0400, Fred Danson wrote:
>Hey Group,
>
>I am considering buying a small Netgear/Linksys router so I can link my
>computer, terminal server, and power supply to the internet through my cable
>modem using NAT (actually it would be considered NAT overload or PAT, but
>Netgear and Linksys call it NAT). All of the Netgear/Linksys advertisements
>that I have seen are very vague about their NAT capabilities.
>
>My goal is to have the ability to telnet to any of my inside devices from an
>outside location. To do this, I would need to setup static PAT tables,
>right? Does anyone know if any of these small routers support this?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Fred

Actually, I think according to the RFCs, it should be called NAPT.  (refer 
to RFC2663).  I think Cisco is the only one who calls it NAT overload / 
PAT.  Others lump it into NAT.  ;)  Well, as long a we understand each 
other it does not really matter on the semantics.

The small routers do allow for static maps.  Although I have heard of 
slight reliability issues with some applications (this is beyond the usual 
problems with NAPT).  They even allow for "DMZ" mode, which is really just 
a static map for inbound connections.  So that would definitely let you do 
what you want.  A lot of my friends who have it insist that it does allow 
for static maps so you can redirect externalip:port into 
internalip:port.  That might give you a more fine tuned level of control.

I am sure a Unix Box using IPFilter or Natd (FreeBSD) would probably do 
much better than these boxes, or a cisco box.  However,  the price of these 
NAPT routers is quite amazing and definitely cheaper than the other 
solutions I mentioned.  (the unix box issue being more of a learning curve 
rather than raw parts, and even with the big price drops, hard to build a 
decent PC for $200 bucks, eh?).

-Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=663&t=657
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to