router rip
version 2
no auto-summary
Also, turn on some debugs and watch the RIP/OSPF announcements and see
what's getting announced. My OSPF knowledge is lacking (memorized and did a
few labs for the Routing test, and haven't touched it since, so it grows
rusty).
63/8 has been carved up to a ton of major ISPs. Sprint has a ton of blocks
in that space as well:
Sprint (NETBLK-SPRN-BLKS) SPRN-BLKS 63.160.0.0 -
63.175.255.255
As does my evil ISP PBI/SBC:
Pacific Bell Internet Services,Inc. (NETBLK-PBI-NET-7) PBI-NET-7
63.192.0.0 -
63.207.255.255
Now, WYSE needs to be giving that Class B back ;-p How much of that address
space is even in use? 5%? 10%? 25% tops?
We run RIPv2 internally and have 63/24 blocks from Sprint & UUNET and have
no reachability problems to other 63/8 blocks.
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
""Moahzam Durrani"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> my company has just acquired a new company and we are trying to integrate
it
> in our infrastructure. Our company owns its owns a class B network of
> 132.237.0.0/16. We are using a frame relay to connect to various sites
> around the world. However the new site we acquired has 2 routable network
> address of 63.76.147.0/24 and 63.76.148.0/24 . I am trying to create a
> static route between our frame router to the frame router at the new site
> which is connected to an old Bay router (original router before
acquisition)
> . I dot know much about the sprint frame but I do know they are
> redristibuting ospf to rip to all existing sites..(not including new
one).
> I have been informed that the 63.0.0.0 ADDRESS BELONGS TO UUNET and Cbale
> and wireless.
>
>
> Lan e0 ----e0 sj frame router s1---- sprint frame ----------s1 texas
frame
> router e0----e0 Bay router ---------63.76.147.0/24-----internet router
> -----internet
> sj (132.237.x.x)
> ---------63.76.148.0/24 LAN
>
>
> Any way when i created a static route with the two 63 adresses from SJ I
> was able to ping the network in Texas , and they vice versa. However I got
> calls from poeple saying that they were no longer able to connect to
certain
> websites , and one of our DS3 went down . The websites we were unable to
> get to all had adresses in the 63.x.x.x /8 range. Also the DS3 had a 63
> networrk address. when I did a sh ip route I saw we were learnin the a
full
> calss A network 63.0.0.0 / 8 subnetted 2 times.
>
> My static route was ip route 63.76.147.0 255.255.255.0 132.237.x.x (e0
sj
> frame router)
> . ... ....148.0
> 255.255.255.0
>
> then from sj fram router sprint added a static for the two networks to
the
> s1 interface of the texas frame router.
>
>
> We have been on for a while trouble shooting this issue with sprint .. and
> they insisted it is not possible to redistribute the two 63 Networks with
a
> class C due to RIP limitations.. however all our IOS are 11.3 and higher..
>
> Eventually after a while we will be replacing the 63 networks with our
> network scheme .. cant do it for a while ... Does any one have an idea
what
> im trying to get to as I dont .....
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3150&t=3150
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
