>Question #2 - That's a good troubleshooting exercise for you. do a "debug
>ip eigrp transactions" on Snider and Robinson to find out why the subnet
>isn't being advertised in the routing table (hint: make sure your summary
>address didn't include that subnet)
That's my point, see the config at the bottom of p725:
interface serial1
ip address 172.16.2.21 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 2 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
My understanding is 192.168.4.0/24 will be supressed by this summay address
when sent out from s1, Snider doesn't see this, but only 192.168.0.0/16,
that's what I have seen from my test.
Actually the case study "Address Aggregation" on p384 says the same thing, I
don't understand why p726 says 192.168.4.0/24 is still get forwarded.
Thanks,
Jerry
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3382&t=3335
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
