I'm fairly sure you don't need the activation key at all. I've written it
down before, to play safe, but never needed it once it's on the box.
Only time I've ever had to put one in is to activate new features after IOS
install.
Does anybody know of any exceptions to this which my complacency may drop me
the wrong side of one day.
Cheers,
Gaz
""Jtnatas Amorim"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'd be grateful if someone could help me solve this problem:
>
> I have a PIX 520 in a customer network with the following show version
> command results:
>
> pix# sh versh har
>
> PIX Version 4.4(4)
>
> Compiled on Thu 06-Jan-00 16:07 by pixbuild
>
> pix up 2 days 3 hours
>
> Hardware: SE440BX2, 128 MB RAM, CPU Pentium II 349 MHz
>
> Flash strata @ base 0x300
>
> 0: ethernet0: address is 00d0.b785.4f86, irq 11
>
> 1: ethernet1: address is 00d0.b783.e78a, irq 10
>
> Licensed Connections: 128
>
> Serial Number: 18029118
>
>
>
> Please I'd like to know if in the case of a PIX software upgrade from a
> 4.4(4) to a 5.2(1) version, I will need a activation Key.
>
> Note: As you can see with the show version command, actually the device
does
> not have a activation key.
>
> Thank in advance,
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6478&t=5976
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
