I don't see why not. The address of Client A will get translated to a
"real" Internet IP (by your NAT at Site A), then the packet will go to Site
B, where it will be seen as any other internet addressed packet, and get
translated by the NAT at Site B. I don't see why there would be any issue.
Having said that, I know there are some applications (like ICQ) that won't
let things that require a direct connection to happen (like file transfers)
if both parties are behind NATs. (unless there is some fancy port
forwarding, etc).
My 2 cents.
Mike W.
"Raees Ahmed Shaikh" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
>
> A question about natting/patting.
>
> Can two duplicate private ip address communicate with each other over
the
> internet. The example below assume there are two sites using the same
> private address of class b range and they happen to use duplicate ips.
>
>
> Client A
> Client B
>
>
172.16.1.1--------------->PIX-------------------Internet-----------------PIX
-------------------Internet-------------------
----------------PIX--------------------150.150.1.1
>
> Inthis example clientA is under a private site which is using a public ip
> address range of 150.150.1.1, which he had configured by himself, the
range
> is not given by an ISP, he is connected to the internet by a firewall and
he
> happens to access a site which has an public registered webserver from the
> same range 150.150.1.1, Will he able to connect to that webserver,
>
> Please explain if yes/no.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9497&t=9496
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
