I think the site with the illegal address scheme will be able to access the
internet, but they won't be able to access any of the sites with the same IP
addresses. For example if one of your workstations is assigned
150.150.1.1/16 and there is a web site with 150.150.1.1/24 and you send a
ping from a workstation with 150.150.1.2/16, you will get the reply from the
other workstation and not the web site. The best thing to do is have the
customer with the illegal address scheme re-number to a private network
number, unless they are never going to access the internet sites in the
150.150.0.0/16 subnet.
> I don't see why not. The address of Client A will get translated to a
> "real" Internet IP (by your NAT at Site A), then the packet will go to
Site
> B, where it will be seen as any other internet addressed packet, and get
> translated by the NAT at Site B. I don't see why there would be any
issue.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9502&t=9496
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
