I don't think 0.0.224.255 will work as a wildcard mask.
11100000 = 224
This would allow the first 3 bits to be on or off, but would force every bit
after 32 to be off all the time. As far as I can see, it would block access
to every odd number and some others that fall within the 18.64 - 18.127
range. The 3rd bit being on would allow the "32" bit to be on or off, which
would mean addresses below 172.22.0.x would be able to access the range.
Again, I'm still new at this so let me know if I'm wrong with that...
- Jeremy Felt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Fowler"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:46 PM
Subject: Access -list problem, my solution [7:12760]
> I've been up 3 hours working on this and my brain is fried. Right before
> that last synapses died I think I came up with the answer. Here is my
> worksheet. Let me know what you think.
>
....[snip]....
>
> deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 access to 18.27
> deny ip 172.22.32.0 0.0.224.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 and above from
accessing 18.64 - 18.127
> permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 everything
else.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank You,
> Robert Fowler
> Network Administrator
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12804&t=12760
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
