With regards to reload - almost never required, a good "wr mem" and
sometimes a "clear xlate" .

With regards to ordering - within an individual portion  they are just
sorted by order of entry ...

With regards to ping-ability - you have not listed a conduit permitting ping
... so by default it is blocked .


Thanks!
TJ


----- Original Message -----
From: "Munzir Khan" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:11 AM
Subject: RE: PIX static map question [7:15983]


> Question for MAJDI & EVANS
>
> just a quick question, Is it really require to restart the pix firewall to
> take effect the new settings??
>
> another question is defining static map for INSIDE/DMZ/OUTSIDE should be
in
> sequence or it does not mater whatever sequence you make.
>
> for example
>
> static (inside,outside) 212.x.x.10 192.168.0.30 netmask 255.255.255.255.
0.0
>
> static (inside, DMZ)
> static (inside)
> static (inside,outisde)
>
> see above it is not in sequence i have the same case, I applied the
settings
> you have suggested but it is not even ping to that IP from outside ...
also
> tell me Conduit need to be also arranged by the Ip addresses ???
>
> please suggest!!!
**********************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
**********************************************************************




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16307&t=15983
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to