Hello Vermill,
Thank you for your answer. I cannot add a mask of 0.0.0.0 under eigrp 1
config. I can only add the network .
On the central router, RTB, I can only see the OSPF routes
The central router has a s0.3 multipoint config with mappings for both
dlci's of the other routers.
The other routers RTA and RTC also have a s0 frame relay config with
mappings for the other 2 routers dlci's
What would be the trick to get EIGRP to discover routes from both routers
RTA and RTC?
And why is OSPF taking over EIGRP?
Please advise.
Thank you.
Here is the output of the central router, RTB:
Gateway of last resort is not set
2.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.0 [110/128] via 7.7.7.2, 00:09:36, Serial0.3
4.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 4.4.4.0 [110/128] via 7.7.7.3, 00:09:36, Serial0.3
O 192.168.10.0/24 [110/70] via 7.7.7.2, 00:09:36, Serial0.3
7.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
O 7.7.7.3/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.3, 00:16:15, Serial0.3
O 7.7.7.2/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.2, 00:16:15, Serial0.3
C 7.7.7.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0.3
9.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 9.9.9.9 is directly connected, Loopback9
15.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 15.15.15.1 [110/65] via 7.7.7.3, 00:09:37, Serial0.3
NO EIGRP routes at all!!
Netw 4 and 15 belong to RTA and
Netw 2 and 192. belong to RTC
Netw 9 belongs to RTB itself.
>From: "s vermill"
>Reply-To: "s vermill"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: ospf over eigrp preference over nbma? [7:31597]
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:20:49 -0500
>
>I suspect that it has to do with the "additional link-state updates" that
>you sometimes read about where OSPF and NBMA multipoint circuits are being
>discussed. Notice that the routes are /32. I don't believe that EIGRP has
>such a mechanism. So OSPF is really the only protocol that knows of the
>/32
>routes. Looking at your topology tables and link-state databases in
>addition to the routing table might confirm that. Or try adding a network
>statement in EIGRP with a 0.0.0.0 mask for each remote router interface.
>Although not something you would necessarily want to do in a real network,
>it might displace those OSPF host routes and help reveal the answer. I'm
>not sure about that though.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31612&t=31597
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
