>Cisco Breaker, > I was thinking. > >One route to guide them, >One static route to override them, >One "floating static" to load-balance them, >And in the RIB make them all equal.. > >Just say the movie...:-> forgive my waste of bandwidth. > >Nigel
It's all right Nigel...every time I hear about the rings, I start thinking about RIFs. As to the original questio, load-sharing works with sets of static routes exactly as it does with sets of dynamic routes. In the specific case, the static routes must be exactly the same in specificity (i.e., prefix length) and administrative distance. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Cisco Breaker" >To: >Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 7:05 AM >Subject: Static route loacd balancing? [7:31715] > > >> Hi all, >> >> My customer wants load balancing solution to a branch office. He heard >that >> it can be done with static routes, but as I know load balancing can't be >> done by deploying static routes. Any help about this? Can it be done or >how >> effective will it be? >> >> Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31731&t=31715 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
