Ditto on the no VLAN policy inquiry... But as far as answering your question, I think that you may be SOL as far as aggregation goes...
You may not be able to aggregate, but you can use CEF per-packet LB in order to solve the problem of needing more bandwidth... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darrell Newcomb" To: Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:35 AM Subject: Re: EtherChannel alternatives(??) [7:33187] > One thing to remember if you do the etherchannel for this customer is > the src/dst mac pairs and their respective flows may not be diverse > enough to offer good load balancing. This is the case for most router > to router subnets such as in customer hand-offs like you seem to have. > > Yes some of the cisco line does src/dst mac+IP (4) tuples which > addresses this problem, but not every box does that. > > I too am interested in why the no VLAN policy in this (hosting?) > environment, > Darrell > > John McCartney wrote: > > > > It is a policy from our IP-Eng group, can't find it in writting but they > > tell me it exists. I think because they like to have control. Oh well..... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33290&t=33187 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
